From: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"nico@fluxnic.net" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: RE: Domain faults when CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN is enabled
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:29:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e60a8ccde1940d68ec4780abe154cbd@EMAIL.axentia.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151210002213.GL8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour uptime
> > after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not gathered data,
> > but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit above 50% when there
> > is a problem so this feels good (I used 5 clean reboots when I bisected
> > and that worked).
> >
> > Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> > Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> >
> > (and please don't forget to cc stable)
>
> I've decided to do a more in-depth fix, so that we also solve the issue
> that when we schedule in these down_read()s, we don't leak the permissive
> domain register setting into the switched-to context.
>
> Can you test this patch please? Thanks.
Still looking good.
Cheers,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-10 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 8:33 Peter Rosin
2015-12-03 11:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 11:38 ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-03 11:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 12:08 ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-03 13:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 16:12 ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-03 16:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 17:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 18:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-12-05 13:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 21:37 ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-10 0:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-10 15:29 ` Peter Rosin [this message]
2015-12-10 16:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-10 18:32 ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-30 16:51 ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-30 16:57 ` Peter Rosin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-03 7:43 Peter Rosin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e60a8ccde1940d68ec4780abe154cbd@EMAIL.axentia.se \
--to=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®