From: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: david@lang.hm, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Greg K-H <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:23:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46432AF8.9050505@cfl.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46424D44.2040003@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Stefan Richter wrote:
> The SCSI stack already has infrastructure for multi-threaded discovery
> and probing.
So? It would still benefit from using a generic framework that other
buses can use as well. Not to mention that the current scsi specific
framework tends to cause unstable names doesn't it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-08 13:37 Cornelia Huck
2007-05-08 14:07 ` Greg KH
2007-05-08 20:58 ` David Miller
2007-05-09 9:44 ` Greg KH
2007-05-09 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-08 14:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-08 14:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-08 15:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-08 16:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-08 16:47 ` david
2007-05-08 21:45 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-08 18:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-08 19:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-08 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-08 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-08 20:26 ` david
2007-05-09 7:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 8:33 ` david
2007-05-09 9:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 9:25 ` david
2007-05-09 13:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 16:18 ` david
2007-05-09 17:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 17:09 ` david
2007-05-09 17:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 17:53 ` david
2007-05-09 18:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 18:52 ` david
2007-05-10 7:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 17:07 ` Greg KH
2007-05-09 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-09 9:30 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-09 22:21 ` Phillip Susi
2007-05-09 22:37 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-10 14:23 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2007-05-10 14:55 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-11 7:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-08 20:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-08 21:41 ` David Miller
2007-05-09 9:55 ` Greg KH
2007-05-09 8:14 ` Duncan Sands
2007-05-09 8:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 9:16 ` Duncan Sands
2007-05-09 12:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-08 20:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 9:53 ` Greg KH
2007-05-09 13:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 16:42 ` Greg KH
2007-05-09 16:50 ` david
2007-05-09 17:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-05-09 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-08 21:15 ` David Miller
2007-05-08 22:19 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-09 9:46 ` Greg KH
2007-05-08 15:15 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46432AF8.9050505@cfl.rr.com \
--to=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®