* Re: Request to mailing list Linux-arm-kernel rejected
[not found] <mailman.0.1178956333.9982.linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
@ 2007-05-12 9:22 ` Simon Arlott
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Simon Arlott @ 2007-05-12 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 12/05/07 08:52, linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
> Your request to the Linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>
> Posting of your message titled "[PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/arm/"
>
> has been rejected by the list moderator. The moderator gave the
> following reason for rejecting your request:
>
> "Non-members are not allowed to post messages to this list. You need
> to subscribe before you're allowed to post. Use the patch system for
> patches (see www.arm.linux.org.uk) "
It's amazing, you appear to have taken the worst feature of bug/feature
management systems - mandatory registration - and applied it to patch
submission too.
Is that rejection message standard? The first part makes no sense - why
would you hold non-subscriber emails in a submission queue and then just
reject them because they're not subscribers?
> Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator
> at:
>
> linux-arm-kernel-owner@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
--
Simon Arlott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-05-12 9:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <mailman.0.1178956333.9982.linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-05-12 9:22 ` Request to mailing list Linux-arm-kernel rejected Simon Arlott
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome