mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <agross@kernel.org>,
	<konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:05:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46bd234c-0b0c-0787-1824-e7cbff768393@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rum7gnnouoz2irn57taxn4j2aajkxf6em6ft6u4w3rxwsym2su@acgczsnl2huz>


On 7/18/2023 12:30 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:10:16PM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>> On 7/18/2023 12:07 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 11:53:24AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>>>> On 7/18/2023 11:29 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 09:08:33AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/qcom_hvc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/qcom_hvc.c
>>> [..]
> [..]
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>>>>>> +	cap_id = readq((void *)(scmi_info->shmem) + size +
>>>>>> +		       sizeof(unsigned long));
>>>>>> +#else
>>>>>> +	cap_id = readl((void *)(scmi_info->shmem) + size +
>>>>>> +		       sizeof(unsigned long));
>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> Please don't make the in-memory representation depend on architecture
>>>>> specific data types. Quite likely you didn't compile test one of these
>>>>> variants?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just define the in-memory representation as u32 + u64.
>>>> I tested this for ARM64, I didn't test it for 32bit since Hypervisor doesn't
>>>> support it currently. In future, it may add 32 bit support too.
>>> I'd not be surprised if the capability id is 64 bit on a 32-bit machine
>>> as well, it's not really a property of the architecture.
>> on 32bit machine, you will have to use SMC32 convention. lt will mean that
>> the parameters can only be 32 bit long. If you keep cap-id 64 bit in 32bit
>> machines, then it has to be passed in two parameters. Are you suggesting, I
>> make this driver dependent on ARM64 and only care about 64 bit for now?
>>
> I'm suggesting that the calling convention is one thing and the
> in-memory format for passing the information to the driver is a
> different thing.
>
> Keep the arguments passed in memory architecture-independent (i.e. make
> it u64).
>
> If you're saying that the calling convention would be different on a
> 32-bit system, then you are also saying that your driver _is_ 64-bit
> specific. Please confirm what the size of your capability id would be in
> such a system and make sure the Kconfig and/or the code, reflects
> reality.
>
> Thanks,
> Bjorn
It is confirmed that cap-id will be 32 bit long on 32bit machines. That 
said, I will make changes to use last 16bytes irrespective of the 
architecture.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 16:08 [PATCH 0/2] " Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add qcom specific hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 17:21   ` Rob Herring
2023-07-18 18:12   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-18 18:18     ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-19 10:39   ` Sudeep Holla
2023-07-19 13:58     ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 18:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-18 18:25     ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 18:42       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-18 21:16         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-19  6:15           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-18 18:29   ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-07-18 18:53     ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 19:07       ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-07-18 19:10         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 19:30           ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-07-18 22:05             ` Nikunj Kela [this message]
2023-07-19 10:55       ` Cristian Marussi
2023-07-19 14:02         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-23  2:15   ` kernel test robot
2023-07-24 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Nikunj Kela
2023-07-24 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: convert nested if-else construct to allOf Nikunj Kela
2023-07-25  6:01     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-24 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: Add qcom specific hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-07-25  6:06     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-24 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport Nikunj Kela
2023-07-25 17:03     ` Cristian Marussi
2023-07-25 17:12       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-31 14:04         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-08-01  7:27     ` kernel test robot
2023-08-11 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Nikunj Kela
2023-08-11 17:57   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: convert nested if-else construct to allOf Nikunj Kela
2023-08-11 17:57   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: Add qcom specific hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-08-11 17:57   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport Nikunj Kela
2023-09-05 16:06   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Nikunj Kela
2023-09-05 16:37     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-07 10:36       ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-07 14:20         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-09-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Konrad Dybcio
2023-09-07 22:32   ` Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43   ` [PATCH v4 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add polling support for completion in smc Nikunj Kela
2023-10-02 18:18     ` Brian Masney
2023-10-02 18:36       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-03 10:33     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 10:50       ` Cristian Marussi
2023-10-03 15:53       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-04 16:11         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-05  3:25           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: convert nested if-else construct to allOf Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: Add new compatible for smc/hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-10-03 10:44     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 15:59       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-04 15:53         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-05 21:51           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support Nikunj Kela
2023-10-02 18:34     ` Brian Masney
2023-10-02 18:39       ` Brian Masney
2023-10-02 18:45         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-02 18:42       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-03 10:48         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 11:19     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 16:16       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-04 16:06         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-04 17:48           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-05 22:20           ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-10-05 22:33             ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-06  7:26             ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-18 15:01   ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Nikunj Kela
2023-09-18 15:15     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-18 15:54       ` Brian Masney
2023-09-19  8:56         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-02 17:31           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-02 17:58             ` Cristian Marussi
2023-10-03 10:34             ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-18 20:32     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Add qcom smc/hvc " Nikunj Kela
2023-10-06 16:42   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add new compatible for smc/hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-10-06 20:08     ` Brian Masney
2023-10-09 14:41     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-09 14:52       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 21:03         ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-10-06 16:42   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom smc/hvc transport support Nikunj Kela
2023-10-06 20:17     ` Brian Masney
2023-10-09 14:47     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-09 14:59       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 15:29         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-09 17:49           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 19:08             ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-09 19:16               ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 19:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 19:14   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add new compatible for smc/hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 19:14   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom smc/hvc transport support Nikunj Kela
2023-10-10 10:42     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-10 10:21   ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46bd234c-0b0c-0787-1824-e7cbff768393@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_nkela@quicinc.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®