mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
To: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Cc: <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <andersson@kernel.org>,
	<konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add polling support for completion in smc
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 11:36:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d5af4d7-23fc-a03e-bad8-760209b537a0@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZRsJWdZVMc+F5ZgF@brian-x1>


On 10/2/2023 11:18 AM, Brian Masney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 12:43:56PM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>> Currently, the return from the smc call assumes the completion of
>> the scmi request. However this may not be true in virtual platforms
>> that are using hvc doorbell.
>>
>> This change adds a Kconfig to enable the polling for the request
>> completion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>   2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
>> index ea0f5083ac47..771d60f8319f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
>> @@ -125,6 +125,20 @@ config ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC_ATOMIC_ENABLE
>>   	  in atomic context too, at the price of using a number of busy-waiting
>>   	  primitives all over instead. If unsure say N.
>>   
>> +config ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC_POLL_COMPLETION
>> +	bool "Enable polling support for SCMI SMC transport"
>> +	depends on ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC
>> +	help
>> +	  Enable completion polling support for SCMI SMC based transport.
>> +
>> +	  If you want the SCMI SMC based transport to poll for the completion,
>> +	  answer Y.
>> +	  Enabling completion polling might be desired in the absence of the a2p
>> +	  irq when the return from smc/hvc call doesn't indicate the completion
>> +	  of the SCMI requests. This might be useful for instances used in
>> +	  virtual platforms.
>> +	  If unsure say N.
>> +
>>   config ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_VIRTIO
>>   	bool "SCMI transport based on VirtIO"
>>   	depends on VIRTIO=y || VIRTIO=ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
>> index c193516a254d..0a0b7e401159 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
>> @@ -250,6 +250,16 @@ static void smc_mark_txdone(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, int ret,
>>   	smc_channel_lock_release(scmi_info);
>>   }
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC_POLL_COMPLETION
>> +static bool
>> +smc_poll_done(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>> +{
>> +	struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info;
>> +
>> +	return shmem_poll_done(scmi_info->shmem, xfer);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   static const struct scmi_transport_ops scmi_smc_ops = {
>>   	.chan_available = smc_chan_available,
>>   	.chan_setup = smc_chan_setup,
>> @@ -257,6 +267,9 @@ static const struct scmi_transport_ops scmi_smc_ops = {
>>   	.send_message = smc_send_message,
>>   	.mark_txdone = smc_mark_txdone,
>>   	.fetch_response = smc_fetch_response,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC_POLL_COMPLETION
>> +	.poll_done = smc_poll_done,
>> +#endif
>>   };
>>   
>>   const struct scmi_desc scmi_smc_desc = {
>> @@ -272,6 +285,6 @@ const struct scmi_desc scmi_smc_desc = {
>>   	 * for the issued command will be immmediately ready to be fetched
>>   	 * from the shared memory area.
>>   	 */
>> -	.sync_cmds_completed_on_ret = true,
>> +	.sync_cmds_completed_on_ret = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC_POLL_COMPLETION),
>>   	.atomic_enabled = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC_ATOMIC_ENABLE),
>  From a Linux distributor viewpoint, it would be nice if this was
> determined at runtime, rather than at compile time. We generate a single
> kernel binary that's used on systems from multiple hardware
> manufacturers. We'd run into an issue if one company required this, but
> another one didn't. We may potentially run into this same type of issue
> with the upstream arm64 defconfig.
>
> Brian
This is a transport dependent property. Either the transport supports 
"completion on return of the smc call" or not. For a given platform, 
this will be fixed for all channels. This is similar to

CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC_ATOMIC_ENABLE which is also a Kconfig.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-02 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 16:08 [PATCH 0/2] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add qcom specific hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 17:21   ` Rob Herring
2023-07-18 18:12   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-18 18:18     ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-19 10:39   ` Sudeep Holla
2023-07-19 13:58     ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 18:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-18 18:25     ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 18:42       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-18 21:16         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-19  6:15           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-18 18:29   ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-07-18 18:53     ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 19:07       ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-07-18 19:10         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-18 19:30           ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-07-18 22:05             ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-19 10:55       ` Cristian Marussi
2023-07-19 14:02         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-23  2:15   ` kernel test robot
2023-07-24 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Nikunj Kela
2023-07-24 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: convert nested if-else construct to allOf Nikunj Kela
2023-07-25  6:01     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-24 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: Add qcom specific hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-07-25  6:06     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-24 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport Nikunj Kela
2023-07-25 17:03     ` Cristian Marussi
2023-07-25 17:12       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-07-31 14:04         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-08-01  7:27     ` kernel test robot
2023-08-11 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Nikunj Kela
2023-08-11 17:57   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: convert nested if-else construct to allOf Nikunj Kela
2023-08-11 17:57   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: Add qcom specific hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-08-11 17:57   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport Nikunj Kela
2023-09-05 16:06   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Nikunj Kela
2023-09-05 16:37     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-07 10:36       ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-07 14:20         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-09-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Konrad Dybcio
2023-09-07 22:32   ` Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43   ` [PATCH v4 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add polling support for completion in smc Nikunj Kela
2023-10-02 18:18     ` Brian Masney
2023-10-02 18:36       ` Nikunj Kela [this message]
2023-10-03 10:33     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 10:50       ` Cristian Marussi
2023-10-03 15:53       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-04 16:11         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-05  3:25           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: convert nested if-else construct to allOf Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: Add new compatible for smc/hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-10-03 10:44     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 15:59       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-04 15:53         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-05 21:51           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-09-11 19:43   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support Nikunj Kela
2023-10-02 18:34     ` Brian Masney
2023-10-02 18:39       ` Brian Masney
2023-10-02 18:45         ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-02 18:42       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-03 10:48         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 11:19     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 16:16       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-04 16:06         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-04 17:48           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-05 22:20           ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-10-05 22:33             ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-06  7:26             ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-18 15:01   ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Nikunj Kela
2023-09-18 15:15     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-18 15:54       ` Brian Masney
2023-09-19  8:56         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-02 17:31           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-02 17:58             ` Cristian Marussi
2023-10-03 10:34             ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-18 20:32     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Add qcom smc/hvc " Nikunj Kela
2023-10-06 16:42   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add new compatible for smc/hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-10-06 20:08     ` Brian Masney
2023-10-09 14:41     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-09 14:52       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 21:03         ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-10-06 16:42   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom smc/hvc transport support Nikunj Kela
2023-10-06 20:17     ` Brian Masney
2023-10-09 14:47     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-09 14:59       ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 15:29         ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-09 17:49           ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 19:08             ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-09 19:16               ` Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 19:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 19:14   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add new compatible for smc/hvc transport for SCMI Nikunj Kela
2023-10-09 19:14   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add qcom smc/hvc transport support Nikunj Kela
2023-10-10 10:42     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-10 10:21   ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d5af4d7-23fc-a03e-bad8-760209b537a0@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_nkela@quicinc.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®