RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_ext: Fix cpu_released while changing sched policy of the running task

[liuwenfang <liuwenfang@honor.com>]

> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 07:20:59AM +0000, liuwenfang wrote:
> >  static void switched_from_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > +	switch_class(rq, p, true);
> > +
> >  	scx_ops_disable_task(p);
> >  }
> 
> Hmm... but this function can be called when @p is not currently running from
> setscheduler() path, and it wouldn't make sense to call switch_class() during
> that.
Yeah, task_current(rq, p) should be checked here.
> 
> >  static void wakeup_preempt_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct
> > *p,int wake_flags) {} -static void switched_to_scx(struct rq *rq,
> > struct task_struct *p) {}
> > +static void switched_to_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {
> > +	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> > +
> > +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&scx_ops_cpu_preempt) &&
> > +	    unlikely(rq->scx.cpu_released)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If the previous sched_class for the current CPU was not SCX,
> > +		 * notify the BPF scheduler that it again has control of the
> > +		 * core. This callback complements ->cpu_release(), which is
> > +		 * emitted in switch_class().
> > +		 */
> > +		if (SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_acquire))
> > +			SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, cpu_acquire, rq, cpu_of(rq), NULL);
> > +		rq->scx.cpu_released = false;
> > +	}
> > +}
> 
> Ditto. This should only apply if @p is current, right?
task_current(rq, p) should be added.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Tejun

Thanks.

--
Wenfang