From: liuwenfang <liuwenfang@honor.com>
To: 'Tejun Heo' <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: 'David Vernet' <void@manifault.com>,
'Andrea Righi' <arighi@nvidia.com>,
'Changwoo Min' <changwoo@igalia.com>,
'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@redhat.com>,
'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@infradead.org>,
'Juri Lelli' <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
'Vincent Guittot' <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
'Dietmar Eggemann' <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
'Ben Segall' <bsegall@google.com>, 'Mel Gorman' <mgorman@suse.de>,
'Valentin Schneider' <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched_ext: Fix cpu_released while RT task and SCX task are scheduled concurrently
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 09:38:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea7ad66c0e6140979ce941189f5a93cc@honor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0144ab66963248cf8587c47bf900aabb@honor.com>
Supposed RT task(RT1) is running on CPU0 and RT task(RT2) is awakened on CPU1,
RT1 becomes sleep and SCX task(SCX1) will be dispatched to CPU0, RT2 will be
placed on CPU0:
CPU0(schedule) CPU1(try_to_wake_up)
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) try_to_wake_up # RT2
__schedule select_task_rq # CPU0 is selected
LOCK rq(0)->lock # lock CPU0 rq ttwu_queue
deactivate_task # RT1 LOCK rq(0)->lock # busy waiting
pick_next_task # no more RT tasks on rq |
prev_balance |
balance_scx |
balance_one |
rq->scx.cpu_released = false; |
consume_global_dsq |
consume_dispatch_q |
consume_remote_task |
UNLOCK rq(0)->lock V
LOCK rq(0)->lock # succ
deactivate_task # SCX1 ttwu_do_activate
LOCK rq(0)->lock # busy waiting activate_task # RT2 equeued
| UNLOCK rq(0)->lock
V
LOCK rq(0)->lock # succ
activate_task # SCX1
pick_task # RT2 is picked
put_prev_set_next_task # prev is RT1, next is RT2, rq->scx.cpu_released = false;
UNLOCK rq(0)->lock
At last, RT2 will be running on CPU0 with rq->scx.cpu_released being false!
So, Add the scx_next_task_picked () and check sched class again to fix the value
of rq->scx.cpu_released.
Signed-off-by: Wenfang Liu liuwenfang@honor.com
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 93e03b7d0..ddf4bd060 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3236,6 +3236,11 @@ void scx_put_prev_set_next(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
*/
smp_store_release(&rq->scx.pnt_seq, rq->scx.pnt_seq + 1);
#endif
+
+ if (next->sched_class == &ext_sched_class)
+ return;
+
+ switch_class(rq, next);
}
static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
@@ -3258,7 +3263,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
*/
if (p->scx.slice && !scx_rq_bypassing(rq)) {
dispatch_enqueue(&rq->scx.local_dsq, p, SCX_ENQ_HEAD);
- goto switch_class;
+ return;
}
/*
@@ -3274,10 +3279,6 @@ static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
do_enqueue_task(rq, p, 0, -1);
}
}
-
-switch_class:
- if (next && next->sched_class != &ext_sched_class)
- switch_class(rq, next);
}
static struct task_struct *first_local_task(struct rq *rq)
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-20 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-21 4:09 [PATCH] " liuwenfang
2025-06-23 19:50 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-06-28 6:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " liuwenfang
2025-07-17 21:38 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-07-20 9:20 ` liuwenfang
2025-07-20 9:38 ` liuwenfang [this message]
2025-08-12 1:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] " 'Tejun Heo'
2025-07-20 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched_ext: Fix cpu_released while changing sched policy of the running task liuwenfang
2025-08-12 1:31 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-08-19 6:52 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched_ext: Fix pnt_seq calculation when picking the next task liuwenfang
2025-08-19 6:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched_ext: Fix cpu_released while RT task and SCX task are scheduled concurrently liuwenfang
2025-08-19 7:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] sched_ext: Fix cpu_released while changing sched policy of the running task liuwenfang
2025-08-19 7:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched_ext: Fix cpu_released while RT task and SCX task are scheduled concurrently Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-19 8:47 ` 回复: " liuwenfang
2025-08-19 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-20 0:28 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-08-20 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-20 16:52 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-06-28 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_ext: Fix cpu_released while changing sched policy of the running task liuwenfang
2025-07-17 21:48 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-07-18 9:06 ` liuwenfang
2025-07-20 9:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sched_ext: Fix pnt_seq calculation liuwenfang
2025-08-12 0:03 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-08-12 0:30 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-08-18 10:45 ` liuwenfang
2025-08-18 17:43 ` 'Tejun Heo'
2025-08-19 7:41 ` liuwenfang
2025-08-18 17:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-19 7:36 ` liuwenfang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea7ad66c0e6140979ce941189f5a93cc@honor.com \
--to=liuwenfang@honor.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome