From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: via-rhine: net: Fix a resource leak in rhine_init()
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 11:57:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <477140c2-841c-616f-fa25-faa428381111@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190503.234131.1909607319842703379.davem@davemloft.net>
On 2019/5/4 11:41, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 11:23:06 +0800
>
>>
>> On 2019/5/4 11:13, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 11:08:13 +0800
>>>
>>>> When platform_driver_register() fails, pci_unregister_driver() is not
>>>> called to release the resource allocated by pci_register_driver().
>>>>
>>>> To fix this bug, error handling code for platform_driver_register()
>>>> and
>>>> pci_register_driver() is separately implemented.
>>>>
>>>> This bug is found by a runtime fuzzing tool named FIZZER written by
>>>> us.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
>>> I think the idea here is that PCI is not enabled in the kernel, it is
>>> fine for the pci register to fail and only the platform register to
>>> succeed.
>>>
>>> You are breaking that.
>> Okay, I can understand it.
>> If so, I think that platform_driver_register() should be called before
>> pci_register_driver(), and it is still necessary to separately handle
>> their errors.
>> If you agree, I will send a v2 patch.
> It is only a failure if both fail.
>
> If at least one succeeds, the driver can potentially probe properly.
Thanks for the explanation, I understand now :)
The code logic seems a little strange, but it should be correct in
rhine_init()...
If so, if one fails, I wonder whether it is correct for rhine_cleanup()
to call both platform_driver_unregister() and pci_unregister_driver()?
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-04 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-04 3:08 Jia-Ju Bai
2019-05-04 3:13 ` David Miller
2019-05-04 3:23 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2019-05-04 3:41 ` David Miller
2019-05-04 3:57 ` Jia-Ju Bai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=477140c2-841c-616f-fa25-faa428381111@gmail.com \
--to=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®