* [PATCH] z3fold: limit use of stale list for allocation
@ 2018-02-10 11:02 Vitaly Wool
2018-02-17 0:28 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Wool @ 2018-02-10 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux-MM, linux-kernel; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Oleksiy.Avramchenko
Currently if z3fold couldn't find an unbuddied page it would first
try to pull a page off the stale list. The problem with this
approach is that we can't 100% guarantee that the page is not
processed by the workqueue thread at the same time unless we run
cancel_work_sync() on it, which we can't do if we're in an atomic
context. So let's just limit stale list usage to non-atomic
contexts only.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Vul <vitaly.vul@sony.com>
---
mm/z3fold.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/z3fold.c b/mm/z3fold.c
index 39e1912..9b0d112 100644
--- a/mm/z3fold.c
+++ b/mm/z3fold.c
@@ -620,24 +620,27 @@ static int z3fold_alloc(struct z3fold_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
bud = FIRST;
}
- spin_lock(&pool->stale_lock);
- zhdr = list_first_entry_or_null(&pool->stale,
- struct z3fold_header, buddy);
- /*
- * Before allocating a page, let's see if we can take one from the
- * stale pages list. cancel_work_sync() can sleep so we must make
- * sure it won't be called in case we're in atomic context.
- */
- if (zhdr && (can_sleep || !work_pending(&zhdr->work))) {
- list_del(&zhdr->buddy);
- spin_unlock(&pool->stale_lock);
- if (can_sleep)
+ page = NULL;
+ if (can_sleep) {
+ spin_lock(&pool->stale_lock);
+ zhdr = list_first_entry_or_null(&pool->stale,
+ struct z3fold_header, buddy);
+ /*
+ * Before allocating a page, let's see if we can take one from
+ * the stale pages list. cancel_work_sync() can sleep so we
+ * limit this case to the contexts where we can sleep
+ */
+ if (zhdr) {
+ list_del(&zhdr->buddy);
+ spin_unlock(&pool->stale_lock);
cancel_work_sync(&zhdr->work);
- page = virt_to_page(zhdr);
- } else {
- spin_unlock(&pool->stale_lock);
- page = alloc_page(gfp);
+ page = virt_to_page(zhdr);
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock(&pool->stale_lock);
+ }
}
+ if (!page)
+ page = alloc_page(gfp);
if (!page)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] z3fold: limit use of stale list for allocation
2018-02-10 11:02 [PATCH] z3fold: limit use of stale list for allocation Vitaly Wool
@ 2018-02-17 0:28 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2018-02-17 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vitaly Wool; +Cc: Linux-MM, linux-kernel, Oleksiy.Avramchenko
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:02:52 +0100 Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently if z3fold couldn't find an unbuddied page it would first
> try to pull a page off the stale list. The problem with this
> approach is that we can't 100% guarantee that the page is not
> processed by the workqueue thread at the same time unless we run
> cancel_work_sync() on it, which we can't do if we're in an atomic
> context. So let's just limit stale list usage to non-atomic
> contexts only.
This smells like a bugfix. What are the end-user visible effects of
the bug?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-17 0:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-10 11:02 [PATCH] z3fold: limit use of stale list for allocation Vitaly Wool
2018-02-17 0:28 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®