mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Bosko Radivojevic <bosko.radivojevic@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Number of bugs - statistics
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 18:22:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48359DE1.8050600@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080522155425.GA2727@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 07:51:35AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> Maybe some other data:
>> * The incoming rate of ACPI bugs has been pretty much flat the last 3
>> years, while the number of Linux (and ACPI) users has grown
>> significantly. The number of unfixed bugs has more than halved, from
>> over 200 to well below 100.
>> * The SCSI maintainer also reports that he sees flat to declining bug
>> rates; again with the increase in Linux user base that is a good sign
> 
> Andrew sees and handles the majority of incoming bug reports.
> Ask him whether he agress with this.
> 
> And ALSA alone has 2000 open bug reports, which makes the open ACPI or 
> SCSI bug numbers relatively irrelevant in any "number of bugs" 
> statistics.

Central facilities like ACPI and SCSI having relatively few [and
according to Arjan a decreasing number of] reported unfixed bugs is...
irrelevant?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -=-= =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-22 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-22 12:28 Bosko Radivojevic
2008-05-22 14:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22 14:51   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-22 15:47     ` Natalie Protasevich
2008-05-22 15:54     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22 16:20       ` Natalie Protasevich
2008-05-22 16:50         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22 17:08           ` Natalie Protasevich
2008-05-22 17:33             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22 17:51               ` Natalie Protasevich
2008-05-22 18:11                 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22 22:18           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-23  9:09             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-23 14:11               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-23 16:50                 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-23 18:29                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-23 20:31                     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-26 17:05                       ` Dave Jones
2008-05-23 10:35           ` James Courtier-Dutton
2008-05-23 15:35             ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-22 16:22       ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-05-22 16:38         ` Bart Van Assche
2008-05-22 17:09         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22 17:45           ` Stefan Richter
2008-05-22 19:17             ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48359DE1.8050600@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=bosko.radivojevic@gmail.com \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®