From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dsd@gentoo.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, vegardno@ifi.uio.no,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] usb-storage: wait for device scanning before mounting root
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:19:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485ACD5D.6070303@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080619204954.GQ4392@parisc-linux.org>
Let's face it, from the POV of several if not all transport layer
drivers, the core API element Scsi_Host is just a superfluous appendage
to the only interesting elements -- target and logical unit, or even
logical unit alone.
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I would suggest that you want one 'channel' per usb endpoint.
No, "channel" is meaningless. Friends don't let friends invent new
meanings for "channel".
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -==- =--==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-19 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-24 20:21 Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-24 21:08 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-24 21:25 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-24 22:56 ` Greg KH
2008-04-24 23:30 ` Matthew Dharm
2008-04-25 6:30 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-25 7:04 ` Matthew Dharm
2008-04-25 8:19 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-25 15:35 ` Matthew Dharm
2008-04-25 16:05 ` Greg KH
2008-04-25 6:09 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-25 7:53 ` Stefan Richter
2008-04-25 8:15 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-25 9:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-06-19 18:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-06-19 18:39 ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-19 18:43 ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-19 18:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-06-19 19:52 ` Matthew Dharm
2008-06-19 20:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-06-19 21:19 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-06-19 19:54 ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-19 20:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-06-19 20:34 ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-19 21:39 ` Alan Stern
2008-06-19 23:13 ` David Brownell
2008-06-20 9:53 ` Gabor Gombas
2008-06-20 14:14 ` Matthew Dharm
2008-06-20 15:15 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-20 15:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-06-20 15:42 ` Alan Stern
2008-06-20 16:37 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485ACD5D.6070303@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=vegardno@ifi.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®