mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Defer not-present segment check in __load_segment_descriptor()
       [not found] <cover.1644292363.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
@ 2022-02-08  9:34 ` Hou Wenlong
  2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Fix wrong privilege check for code segment " Hou Wenlong
  2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Move the unhandled outer privilege level logic of far return into __load_segment_descriptor() Hou Wenlong
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hou Wenlong @ 2022-02-08  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm
  Cc: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Wanpeng Li,
	Jim Mattson, Joerg Roedel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin,
	Marcelo Tosatti, Gleb Natapov, linux-kernel

Per Intel's SDM on the "Instruction Set Reference", when
loading segment descriptor, not-present segment check should
be after all type and privilege checks. But the emulator checks
it first, then #NP is triggered instead of #GP if privilege fails
and segment is not present. Put not-present segment check after
type and privilege checks in __load_segment_descriptor().

Fixes: 38ba30ba51a00 (KVM: x86 emulator: Emulate task switch in emulator.c)
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 9e4a00d04532..b7ee7de9f8cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -1616,11 +1616,6 @@ static int __load_segment_descriptor(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		goto exception;
 	}

-	if (!seg_desc.p) {
-		err_vec = (seg == VCPU_SREG_SS) ? SS_VECTOR : NP_VECTOR;
-		goto exception;
-	}
-
 	dpl = seg_desc.dpl;

 	switch (seg) {
@@ -1660,6 +1655,10 @@ static int __load_segment_descriptor(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 	case VCPU_SREG_TR:
 		if (seg_desc.s || (seg_desc.type != 1 && seg_desc.type != 9))
 			goto exception;
+		if (!seg_desc.p) {
+			err_vec = NP_VECTOR;
+			goto exception;
+		}
 		old_desc = seg_desc;
 		seg_desc.type |= 2; /* busy */
 		ret = ctxt->ops->cmpxchg_emulated(ctxt, desc_addr, &old_desc, &seg_desc,
@@ -1684,6 +1683,11 @@ static int __load_segment_descriptor(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		break;
 	}

+	if (!seg_desc.p) {
+		err_vec = (seg == VCPU_SREG_SS) ? SS_VECTOR : NP_VECTOR;
+		goto exception;
+	}
+
 	if (seg_desc.s) {
 		/* mark segment as accessed */
 		if (!(seg_desc.type & 1)) {
--
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Fix wrong privilege check for code segment in __load_segment_descriptor()
       [not found] <cover.1644292363.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
  2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Defer not-present segment check in __load_segment_descriptor() Hou Wenlong
@ 2022-02-08  9:34 ` Hou Wenlong
  2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Move the unhandled outer privilege level logic of far return into __load_segment_descriptor() Hou Wenlong
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hou Wenlong @ 2022-02-08  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm
  Cc: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Wanpeng Li,
	Jim Mattson, Joerg Roedel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel

Code segment descriptor can be loaded by jmp/call/ret, iret
and int. The privilege checks are different between those
instructions above realmode. Although, the emulator has
use x86_transfer_type enumerate to differentiate them, but
it is not really used in __load_segment_descriptor(). Note,
far jump/call to call gate, task gate or task state segment
are not implemented in emulator.

As for far jump/call to code segment, if DPL > CPL for conforming
code or (RPL > CPL or DPL != CPL) for non-conforming code, it
should trigger #GP. The current checks are ok.

As for far return, if RPL < CPL or DPL > RPL for conforming
code or DPL != RPL for non-conforming code, it should trigger #GP.
Outer level return is not implemented above virtual-8086 mode in
emulator. So it implies that RPL <= CPL, but the current checks
wouldn't trigger #GP if RPL < CPL.

As for code segment loading in task switch, if DPL > RPL for conforming
code or DPL != RPL for non-conforming code, it should trigger #TS. Since
segment selector is loaded before segment descriptor when load state from
tss, it implies that RPL = CPL, so the current checks are ok.

The only problem in current implementation is missing RPL < CPL check for
far return. However, change code to follow the manual is better.

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index b7ee7de9f8cd..37c4213bdcc1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -1631,14 +1631,29 @@ static int __load_segment_descriptor(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		if (!(seg_desc.type & 8))
 			goto exception;

-		if (seg_desc.type & 4) {
-			/* conforming */
-			if (dpl > cpl)
-				goto exception;
-		} else {
-			/* nonconforming */
-			if (rpl > cpl || dpl != cpl)
-				goto exception;
+		/* RET can never return to an inner privilege level. */
+		if (transfer == X86_TRANSFER_RET && rpl < cpl)
+			goto exception;
+		if (transfer == X86_TRANSFER_RET || transfer == X86_TRANSFER_TASK_SWITCH) {
+			if (seg_desc.type & 4) {
+				/* conforming */
+				if (dpl > rpl)
+					goto exception;
+			} else {
+				/* nonconforming */
+				if (dpl != rpl)
+					goto exception;
+			}
+		} else { /* X86_TRANSFER_CALL_JMP */
+			if (seg_desc.type & 4) {
+				/* conforming */
+				if (dpl > cpl)
+					goto exception;
+			} else {
+				/* nonconforming */
+				if (rpl > cpl || dpl != cpl)
+					goto exception;
+			}
 		}
 		/* in long-mode d/b must be clear if l is set */
 		if (seg_desc.d && seg_desc.l) {
--
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Move the unhandled outer privilege level logic of far return into __load_segment_descriptor()
       [not found] <cover.1644292363.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
  2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Defer not-present segment check in __load_segment_descriptor() Hou Wenlong
  2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Fix wrong privilege check for code segment " Hou Wenlong
@ 2022-02-08  9:34 ` Hou Wenlong
  2022-02-25 15:07   ` Paolo Bonzini
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hou Wenlong @ 2022-02-08  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm
  Cc: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Wanpeng Li,
	Jim Mattson, Joerg Roedel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel

Outer-privilege level return is not implemented in emulator,
move the unhandled logic into __load_segment_descriptor to
make it easier to understand why the checks for RET are
incomplete.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 37c4213bdcc1..bd91b952eb0a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -1631,9 +1631,14 @@ static int __load_segment_descriptor(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		if (!(seg_desc.type & 8))
 			goto exception;
 
-		/* RET can never return to an inner privilege level. */
-		if (transfer == X86_TRANSFER_RET && rpl < cpl)
-			goto exception;
+		if (transfer == X86_TRANSFER_RET) {
+			/* RET can never return to an inner privilege level. */
+			if (rpl < cpl)
+				goto exception;
+			/* Outer-privilege level return is not implemented */
+			if (rpl > cpl)
+				return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
+		}
 		if (transfer == X86_TRANSFER_RET || transfer == X86_TRANSFER_TASK_SWITCH) {
 			if (seg_desc.type & 4) {
 				/* conforming */
@@ -2228,9 +2233,6 @@ static int em_ret_far(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 	rc = emulate_pop(ctxt, &cs, ctxt->op_bytes);
 	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 		return rc;
-	/* Outer-privilege level return is not implemented */
-	if (ctxt->mode >= X86EMUL_MODE_PROT16 && (cs & 3) > cpl)
-		return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
 	rc = __load_segment_descriptor(ctxt, (u16)cs, VCPU_SREG_CS, cpl,
 				       X86_TRANSFER_RET,
 				       &new_desc);
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Move the unhandled outer privilege level logic of far return into __load_segment_descriptor()
  2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Move the unhandled outer privilege level logic of far return into __load_segment_descriptor() Hou Wenlong
@ 2022-02-25 15:07   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2022-02-25 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hou Wenlong, kvm
  Cc: Sean Christopherson, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Wanpeng Li, Jim Mattson,
	Joerg Roedel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
	Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel

On 2/8/22 10:34, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> Outer-privilege level return is not implemented in emulator,
> move the unhandled logic into __load_segment_descriptor to
> make it easier to understand why the checks for RET are
> incomplete.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 14 ++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 37c4213bdcc1..bd91b952eb0a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -1631,9 +1631,14 @@ static int __load_segment_descriptor(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>   		if (!(seg_desc.type & 8))
>   			goto exception;
>   
> -		/* RET can never return to an inner privilege level. */
> -		if (transfer == X86_TRANSFER_RET && rpl < cpl)
> -			goto exception;
> +		if (transfer == X86_TRANSFER_RET) {
> +			/* RET can never return to an inner privilege level. */
> +			if (rpl < cpl)
> +				goto exception;
> +			/* Outer-privilege level return is not implemented */
> +			if (rpl > cpl)
> +				return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
> +		}
>   		if (transfer == X86_TRANSFER_RET || transfer == X86_TRANSFER_TASK_SWITCH) {
>   			if (seg_desc.type & 4) {
>   				/* conforming */
> @@ -2228,9 +2233,6 @@ static int em_ret_far(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>   	rc = emulate_pop(ctxt, &cs, ctxt->op_bytes);
>   	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>   		return rc;
> -	/* Outer-privilege level return is not implemented */
> -	if (ctxt->mode >= X86EMUL_MODE_PROT16 && (cs & 3) > cpl)
> -		return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
>   	rc = __load_segment_descriptor(ctxt, (u16)cs, VCPU_SREG_CS, cpl,
>   				       X86_TRANSFER_RET,
>   				       &new_desc);

Queued all three, thanks!

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-25 15:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <cover.1644292363.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Defer not-present segment check in __load_segment_descriptor() Hou Wenlong
2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Fix wrong privilege check for code segment " Hou Wenlong
2022-02-08  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86/emulator: Move the unhandled outer privilege level logic of far return into __load_segment_descriptor() Hou Wenlong
2022-02-25 15:07   ` Paolo Bonzini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®