From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex@shazbot.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during display of sysfs status attribute
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:51:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48f2d952-3116-4e0c-b0e6-bc6460446c08@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3b21393-d01f-4816-90b6-4c868d4a0f9d@linux.ibm.com>
On 8/11/26 2:20 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 8/11/26 2:03 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> On 8/10/26 3:22 PM, Anthony Krowiak wrote:
>>> The status_show function that supports display of the status attribute of
>>> the devices in /sys/bus/ap/devices calls the vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue
>>> function which iterates the matrix_dev->mdev_list to find the object
>>> representing the queue device whose status is to be displayed. In order to
>>> traverse this list, the matrix_dev->guests_lock mutex must be held which is
>>> not the case.
>>>
>>> To fix this, the guests_lock mutex is taken prior to taking the
>>> matrix_dev->mdevs_lock mutex in the status_show function. It is taken
>>> there rather than the vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue function - where it is
>>> needed - because it must be taken prior to the mdevs_lock mutex in order to
>>> adhere to the proper locking order and prevent a lockdep splat; also
>>> because the mdevs_lock is needed there to access fields within
>>> the matrix_mdev object in that function.
>>>
>>> Fixes: f139862b92cf ("s390/vfio-ap: add status attribute to AP queue device's sysfs dir")
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
>> Please see my comment on patch 3.
> Also same idea here, I don't believe the pre-existing finding from
> Sashiko against this patch is resolved by this series, so have a look
> and consider a follow-on patch if it's a valid report.
Can you be more specific as to which Sashiko finding you are talking about?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 19:22 [PATCH v2 0/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix bugs in vfio_ap device driver callback functions Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix stale do_remove flag across iterations in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 14:57 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking for NULL Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 15:53 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix use of wrong lock in mdev probe function Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 15:58 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-11 18:42 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 18:44 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-11 18:53 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during update of ap_matrix_mdev object Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 16:38 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix control domain removal in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 17:14 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] s390/vfio-ap: fix potential use of uninitialized apm_filtered bitmap Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 18:02 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-11 19:24 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during display of sysfs status attribute Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 18:03 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-11 18:20 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-11 18:51 ` Anthony Krowiak [this message]
2026-08-11 18:55 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-11 20:19 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 18:43 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix hot-unplug skipped when last AP adapter or domain removed Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 20:43 ` Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48f2d952-3116-4e0c-b0e6-bc6460446c08@linux.ibm.com \
--to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®