From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: <ccache@lists.samba.org>, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@mit.edu>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:48:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4964C0A3.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090107132337.GA2289@uranus.ravnborg.org>
>>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> 07.01.09 14:23 >>>
>On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:35:09PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> 07.01.09 12:31 >>>
>> >What is the gain/pain ratio here?
>>
>> Certainly depends on the pov - it reduces the kernel module (disk) image
>> sizes quite a bit, so from a distro perspective its a move against the ever
>> growing package sizes (and the disk space) hundreds or even thousands
>> of modules require.
>
>The kernel modules seldom export anything so the benefit is minimal here.
Not really, for highly modular distro kernels.
>I did a 15 minutes hack to try ripping the .c -> .s -> .o stuff out.
Looks good to me. In case you decide to revert the stuff for .29, I'll
merge this into my patch.
>Jan - I need some hard numbers to convince me that stripping the
>__crc symbols is worth it.
The on-disk size of the modules in my builds is reduced by about 5% with
this patch (but I can't immediately tell how much of this is due to __crc_*
vs. other symbol stripping).
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-06 15:15 Theodore Ts'o
2009-01-06 15:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 17:33 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 17:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 18:04 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 8:50 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 11:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 12:35 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 13:48 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2009-01-07 20:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-08 19:16 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-12 14:06 ` Gilles Espinasse
2009-01-06 17:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 16:26 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 22:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 4:33 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 5:10 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:03 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:37 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:40 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 14:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-08 19:17 ` Dave Jones
2009-01-08 21:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 21:48 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-11 22:11 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:51 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:55 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-15 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-15 13:40 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4964C0A3.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=ccache@lists.samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome