From: Mark Hounschell <markh@compro.net>
To: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@cfl.rr.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Can't boot a (HZ = 1000) kernel using an AMD Phenom-II processor
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:08:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49763D49.7050907@compro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090120093732.GC3764@alberich.amd.com>
Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:08:41AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> john stultz wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>> I upgraded from a Phenom to a Phenom-II processor and I could no longer boot.
>>>>
>>>> I have tried kernels from 2.6.26 through 2.6.28.
>>>>
>>>> I _can_ however boot these kernels when they are configured for HZ = 250. I
>>>> haven't tried HZ = 300. But certainly if HZ = 1000 the boot hangs at the spot
>>>> indicated below in the dmesg output.
>>>>
>>>> The machine is up and stable running 2.6.26.8 with a (HZ = 1000) configured kernel.
>>>>
>>>> While running a 2.6.26.8 kernel configured for HZ = 250:
>>> [snip]
>>>> vmalloc : 0xf4800000 - 0xff7fe000 ( 175 MB)
>>>> lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xf4000000 ( 832 MB)
>>>> .init : 0xc0373000 - 0xc03a9000 ( 216 kB)
>>>> .data : 0xc02b5336 - 0xc036c6d0 ( 732 kB)
>>>> .text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc02b5336 (1748 kB)
>>>> Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The 2.6.26.8 kernel hangs up right here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> CPA: page pool initialized 1 of 1 pages preallocated
>>>> SLUB: Genslabs=12, HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=4, Nodes=1
>>>> hpet clockevent registered
>>>> calibrate_delay_direct() failed to get a good estimate for loops_per_jiffy.
>>> This looks suspect. Probably something is off with the timer
>>> interrupt, that's causing the calibration to be way off.
>>>
>>> Does booting with hpet=disable change anything?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> -john
>> John,
>>
>> I tried this with 2.6.26, 2.6.28, and 2.6.29-rc2. It didn't change anything.
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I just want to second what Boris already stated.
> Obviously your BIOS doesn't properly initialize your CPU.
>
> Your BIOS programs the processor name string as
> "AMD Processor model unknown"
>
> I would have expected to see something like "AMD Phenom(tm) II X4"
>
> This shows that the BIOS doesn't know your CPU model and it is an
> indication that your CPU is not correctly initialized. Phenom II is a
> different CPU model than Phenom and several configuration bits
> (e.g. MSRs, CPU config space) need different settings from BIOS
> or they even were reserved in previous family 10h CPU models.
>
> IMHO it is a waste of time to try to debug/fix your problem from OS.
> First you should update your BIOS. You need to check the "CPU
> support"-information from your motherboard vendor to see whether your
> motherboard supports Phenom II and which BIOS is required.
>
Understood and agreed with.
> If you know that your BIOS/motherboard are supposed to support Phenom II
> and the problem persists then it is a different game and we should
> definitely look into your problem.
>
> So what's your BIOS version and motherboard vendor/model?
> (And output of dmidecode would be helpful.)
>
>
The MB is a Biostar TA770+. It is not yet listed as one with new
BIOS support for the Phenom-II. Only the TA770+ SE is at the moment.
The only difference in the Sata port arrangement and the BIOS type.
I guess I'll just keep pinging them.
Regards
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-18 12:38 Mark Hounschell
2009-01-19 8:48 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-19 12:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 14:45 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-19 23:05 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-19 14:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-01-19 14:54 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-19 23:14 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-20 0:25 ` john stultz
2009-01-20 9:08 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-20 9:37 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-01-20 21:08 ` Mark Hounschell [this message]
2009-01-23 9:34 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-23 13:04 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-01-23 14:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-01-23 22:24 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-23 22:46 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-26 18:26 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-27 16:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-01-28 0:30 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-28 0:33 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-01-31 9:15 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-02 17:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-02-03 9:17 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-03 15:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-02-03 19:15 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-05 17:19 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-06 13:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-02-06 14:11 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-06 17:55 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-06 22:20 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-09 14:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-02-09 15:29 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-18 13:11 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-18 14:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-02-18 16:57 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-18 17:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-02-18 21:16 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-19 10:37 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-19 14:11 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-19 15:16 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-19 15:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-02-19 15:54 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-20 11:53 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-20 12:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 21:51 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-20 15:43 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-20 16:08 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-20 16:38 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-20 17:09 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-20 17:40 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-20 18:22 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-20 18:28 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-20 19:54 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-20 20:27 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-20 22:28 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-21 1:14 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-21 13:20 ` Mark Hounschell
2009-02-20 17:06 ` Mark Hounschell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49763D49.7050907@compro.net \
--to=markh@compro.net \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=dmarkh@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome