[PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code

[PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code

[Bernard Zhao]

The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings)
, fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch
if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <zhaojunkui2008@126.com>
---
 drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_pro.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_pro.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_pro.c
index ebe087f258e3..70c5aef57247 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_pro.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_pro.c
@@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ static int pcan_usb_pro_init(struct peak_usb_device *dev)
 		     pcan_usb_pro.name,
 		     bi->hw_rev, bi->serial_num_hi, bi->serial_num_lo,
 		     pcan_usb_pro.ctrl_count);
+
+		kfree(bi);
+		kfree(fi);
 	} else {
 		usb_if = pcan_usb_pro_dev_if(dev->prev_siblings);
 	}
@@ -913,9 +916,6 @@ static int pcan_usb_pro_init(struct peak_usb_device *dev)
 	/* set LED in default state (end of init phase) */
 	pcan_usb_pro_set_led(dev, PCAN_USBPRO_LED_DEVICE, 1);
 
-	kfree(bi);
-	kfree(fi);
-
 	return 0;
 
  err_out:
-- 
2.33.1

Re: [PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]

On 10.05.2022 23:38:38, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings)
> , fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch
> if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.

Please move the variable declaration into that scope, too. Adjust the
error handling accordingly.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re:Re: [PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code

[z]

At 2022-05-11 14:44:50, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>On 10.05.2022 23:38:38, Bernard Zhao wrote:
>> The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings)
>> , fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch
>> if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.
>
>Please move the variable declaration into that scope, too. Adjust the
>error handling accordingly.

Hi Marc:

I am not sure if there is some gap.
If we move the variable declaration into that scope, then each error branch has to do the kfree job, like:
if (err) {
			dev_err(dev->netdev->dev.parent,
				"unable to read %s firmware info (err %d)\n",
				pcan_usb_pro.name, err);
	                kfree(bi);
	                kfree(fi);
	                kfree(usb_if);

	               return err;
		}
I am not sure if this looks a little less clear?
Thanks!

BR//Bernard
>
>regards,
>Marc
>
>-- 
>Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
>Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
>Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
>Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Re: Re: [PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code

[Vincent MAILHOL]

On Wed. 11 May 2022 at 16:11, z <zhaojunkui2008@126.com> wrote:
> At 2022-05-11 14:44:50, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >On 10.05.2022 23:38:38, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> >> The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings)
> >> , fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch
> >> if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.
> >
> >Please move the variable declaration into that scope, too. Adjust the
> >error handling accordingly.
>
> Hi Marc:
>
> I am not sure if there is some gap.
> If we move the variable declaration into that scope, then each error branch has to do the kfree job, like:
> if (err) {
>                         dev_err(dev->netdev->dev.parent,
>                                 "unable to read %s firmware info (err %d)\n",
>                                 pcan_usb_pro.name, err);
>                         kfree(bi);
>                         kfree(fi);
>                         kfree(usb_if);
>
>                        return err;
>                 }
> I am not sure if this looks a little less clear?
> Thanks!

A cleaner way would be to move all the content of the if
(!dev->prev_siblings) to a new function.


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol

Re:Re: Re: [PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code

[z]

At 2022-05-11 16:28:26, "Vincent MAILHOL" <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>On Wed. 11 May 2022 at 16:11, z <zhaojunkui2008@126.com> wrote:
>> At 2022-05-11 14:44:50, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>> >On 10.05.2022 23:38:38, Bernard Zhao wrote:
>> >> The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings)
>> >> , fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch
>> >> if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.
>> >
>> >Please move the variable declaration into that scope, too. Adjust the
>> >error handling accordingly.
>>
>> Hi Marc:
>>
>> I am not sure if there is some gap.
>> If we move the variable declaration into that scope, then each error branch has to do the kfree job, like:
>> if (err) {
>>                         dev_err(dev->netdev->dev.parent,
>>                                 "unable to read %s firmware info (err %d)\n",
>>                                 pcan_usb_pro.name, err);
>>                         kfree(bi);
>>                         kfree(fi);
>>                         kfree(usb_if);
>>
>>                        return err;
>>                 }
>> I am not sure if this looks a little less clear?
>> Thanks!
>
>A cleaner way would be to move all the content of the if
>(!dev->prev_siblings) to a new function.

Hi Vincent Mailhol:

Got it.
This seems to be a good idea, i would resubmit one patch V2.
Thanks!

BR//Bernard
>
>Yours sincerely,
>Vincent Mailhol

Re: [PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1642 bytes --]

On 11.05.2022 17:28:26, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> On Wed. 11 May 2022 at 16:11, z <zhaojunkui2008@126.com> wrote:
> > At 2022-05-11 14:44:50, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > >On 10.05.2022 23:38:38, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> > >> The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings)
> > >> , fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch
> > >> if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.
> > >
> > >Please move the variable declaration into that scope, too. Adjust the
> > >error handling accordingly.
> >
> > Hi Marc:
> >
> > I am not sure if there is some gap.
> > If we move the variable declaration into that scope, then each error branch has to do the kfree job, like:
> > if (err) {
> >                         dev_err(dev->netdev->dev.parent,
> >                                 "unable to read %s firmware info (err %d)\n",
> >                                 pcan_usb_pro.name, err);
> >                         kfree(bi);
> >                         kfree(fi);
> >                         kfree(usb_if);
> >
> >                        return err;
> >                 }
> > I am not sure if this looks a little less clear?
> > Thanks!
> 
> A cleaner way would be to move all the content of the if
> (!dev->prev_siblings) to a new function.

Good idea.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]