* [PATCH] kmemcheck: depend on HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK
@ 2009-06-28 11:10 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2009-06-28 11:07 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2009-06-28 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum; +Cc: Pekka Enberg, linux-kernel
to make it selectable if it is available
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
---
lib/Kconfig.kmemcheck | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kmemcheck b/lib/Kconfig.kmemcheck
index 603c81b..9ccca0d 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.kmemcheck
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.kmemcheck
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
config HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK
bool
+if HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK
menuconfig KMEMCHECK
bool "kmemcheck: trap use of uninitialized memory"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
@@ -89,3 +90,4 @@ config KMEMCHECK_BITOPS_OK
accesses where not all the bits are initialized at the same time.
This may also hide some real bugs.
+endif
--
1.6.0.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: depend on HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK
2009-06-28 11:10 [PATCH] kmemcheck: depend on HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2009-06-28 11:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-01 20:27 ` Vegard Nossum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-28 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; +Cc: Vegard Nossum, linux-kernel
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> to make it selectable if it is available
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Looks good to me! Thanks.
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: depend on HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK
2009-06-28 11:07 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-07-01 20:27 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-09-21 20:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2009-07-01 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg; +Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, linux-kernel
2009/6/28 Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>
>> to make it selectable if it is available
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
>
> Looks good to me! Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Applied, thanks.
Vegard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: depend on HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK
2009-07-01 20:27 ` Vegard Nossum
@ 2009-09-21 20:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2009-09-21 21:22 ` Vegard Nossum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2009-09-21 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum; +Cc: Pekka Enberg, linux-kernel
* Vegard Nossum | 2009-07-01 22:27:32 [+0200]:
>2009/6/28 Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>:
>> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>>
>>> to make it selectable if it is available
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
>>
>> Looks good to me! Thanks.
>>
>> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
>
>Applied, thanks.
This patch did not make it into v31. Do you thing it is possible that it
will reach v32?
>Vegard
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: depend on HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK
2009-09-21 20:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2009-09-21 21:22 ` Vegard Nossum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2009-09-21 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; +Cc: Pekka Enberg, linux-kernel
2009/9/21 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
> * Vegard Nossum | 2009-07-01 22:27:32 [+0200]:
>
>>2009/6/28 Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>:
>>> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>>>
>>>> to make it selectable if it is available
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
>>>
>>> Looks good to me! Thanks.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
>>
>>Applied, thanks.
>
> This patch did not make it into v31. Do you thing it is possible that it
> will reach v32?
Yes. I will send a pull request tonight :-)
Vegard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-21 21:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-28 11:10 [PATCH] kmemcheck: depend on HAVE_ARCH_KMEMCHECK Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2009-06-28 11:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-01 20:27 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-09-21 20:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2009-09-21 21:22 ` Vegard Nossum
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®