* [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix i_blocks accounting
@ 2009-07-08 19:45 Eric Sandeen
2009-07-08 21:29 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-07-08 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Andi Kleen, William Lee Irwin III
As reported in Red Hat bz #509671, i_blocks for files on hugetlbfs
get accounting wrong when doing something like:
$ > foo
$ date > foo
date: write error: Invalid argument
$ /usr/bin/stat foo
File: `foo'
Size: 0 Blocks: 18446744073709547520 IO Block: 2097152 regular
...
This is because hugetlb_unreserve_pages() is unconditionally
removing blocks_per_huge_page(h) on each call rather than using
the freed amount. If there were 0 blocks, it goes negative,
resulting in the above.
This is a regression from commit
a5516438959d90b071ff0a484ce4f3f523dc3152
which did:
- inode->i_blocks -= BLOCKS_PER_HUGEPAGE * freed;
+ inode->i_blocks -= blocks_per_huge_page(h);
so just put back the freed multiplier, and it's all happy again.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
---
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index d0351e3..cafdcee 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2370,7 +2370,7 @@ void hugetlb_unreserve_pages(struct inode *inode, long offset, long freed)
long chg = region_truncate(&inode->i_mapping->private_list, offset);
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
- inode->i_blocks -= blocks_per_huge_page(h);
+ inode->i_blocks -= (blocks_per_huge_page(h) * freed);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
hugetlb_put_quota(inode->i_mapping, (chg - freed));
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix i_blocks accounting
2009-07-08 19:45 [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix i_blocks accounting Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-07-08 21:29 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2009-07-08 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List, Andi Kleen, William Lee Irwin III
> which did:
>
> - inode->i_blocks -= BLOCKS_PER_HUGEPAGE * freed;
> + inode->i_blocks -= blocks_per_huge_page(h);
>
> so just put back the freed multiplier, and it's all happy again.
Thanks looks good. Silly typo.
Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-08 21:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-08 19:45 [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix i_blocks accounting Eric Sandeen
2009-07-08 21:29 ` Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome