From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Brayan Arraes <brayan@yack.com.br>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysrq, kdump: fix regression, revert "simplify sysrq-c handler"
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:00:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A65598D.7020808@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1d47vnoq6.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> 1) This fix breaks our tools.
>> This fix changes the ABI. panic_on_oops is default 0,
>> and a lots system do not specify the boot option "panic",
>> thus, Sysrq-c will not cause CrashDump(Kdump) as expected.
>
> How does it break your tools?
Sysrq-c is known for causing a CrashDump.
This fix make Sysrq-c just causing an oops.
An oops in process context just kills current task and
does nothing. (panic_on_oops=0)
Why we let a cleanup patch changes the kernel behavior so much?
>
>> 2) When CONFIG_KEXEC=n, Sysrq-c should become an invalid
>> command like Sysrq-D(CONFIG_LOCKDEP, show-all-locks).
>> But this fix makes it a valid command and let it do a
>> hazard thing: cause a page fault(NULL dereference) in kernel.
>>
>> So, we revert this fix.
>
> The idea was to extend sysrq-d to also be a way of testing NULL
> pointer dereferences. How is that a bad idea?
>
When CONFIG_KEXEC=n, Crashdump is not available,
Sysrq-c should become an invalid command.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-21 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-20 12:46 Lai Jiangshan
2009-07-20 19:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-20 21:16 ` Neil Horman
2009-07-21 6:46 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-07-21 22:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-21 6:00 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2009-07-21 6:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-21 6:49 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-21 11:08 ` Neil Horman
2009-07-21 12:16 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-07-22 2:01 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-22 11:10 ` Neil Horman
2009-07-22 13:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-22 19:38 ` Neil Horman
2009-07-23 1:10 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-23 1:09 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A65598D.7020808@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brayan@yack.com.br \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome