mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 1/8] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:53:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B282F9E.7070902@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0912150855040.16754@router.home>

Hello, Christoph.

On 12/16/2009 12:04 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> A static array would have to be dimensioned to NR_CPUS. That is one thing
> we are trying to avoid.
> 
> The assignment of the pageset "percpu" pointer does not mean that the pcp
> is usable. It must first be properly initialized through setup_pageset().
>
> setup_pageset() is run for each cpu. zone->pageset is the same for all
> cpus that is why it is in zone_pcp_init() and not in setup_pageset().
> 
> The boot pageset initialization was moved into __build_all_zonelists(). We
> could move the zone->pageset initialization there too?

Maybe that is a bit less scary. (at least for me :-) The reason why
I'm a bit worried is that different architectures handle percpu
pointers differently before setup_per_cpu_areas().  x86 sets up the
offsets and stuff such that cpu0 can access the original percpu
section in the kernel image.  ia64 sets up everything properly way
before setup_per_cpu_areas() and in some archs percpu pointers are
completely invalid before setup_per_cpu_areas().  So, percpu pointer
being handled in generic code which is being called before percpu
setup is a bit worrying.

Another thing is that there were attempts to simplify memory
initialization stages such that bootmem is removed and page / k*
allocators can be used earlier which kind of puts percpu allocator in
the dependency loop but I don't think it's something we need to worry
about at this point.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-16  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-14 22:03 [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 1/8] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  3:53   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 15:04     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16  0:53       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-12-16 14:55         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17  0:23           ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 2/8] this_cpu ops: Remove pageset_notifier Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 3/8] Use this_cpu operations in slub Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 4/8] SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 5/8] this_cpu: Remove slub kmem_cache fields Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 6/8] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  6:24   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-15 14:46     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 14:59       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  4:03   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 22:41     ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-16 16:10       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17  0:25         ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17  5:42           ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 8/8] Remove cpu_local_xx macros Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15  4:04   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15  6:37 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Pekka Enberg
2009-12-15  6:47   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 14:50     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:06 ` Mel Gorman
2009-12-16 14:44   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16 21:36     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-16  0:58   ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16  1:40     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-16  1:46       ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17 13:39         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 19:28           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 20:25             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 20:43               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18  0:13                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-18  0:27                   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B282F9E.7070902@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome