From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 1/8] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:23:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B297A0C.4060009@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0912160849150.8572@router.home>
Hello,
On 12/16/2009 11:55 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> The boot pageset initialization was moved into __build_all_zonelists(). We
>>> could move the zone->pageset initialization there too?
>>
>> Maybe that is a bit less scary. (at least for me :-) The reason why
>
> Wel sorry moving the ->pageset assign to __build_all_zonelists does not
> work since __build_all_zonelists does not scan through
> zones. zone_pcp_init is called reliable first for all zones. I think just
> leave it at is.
Ah, well, alright.
>> I'm a bit worried is that different architectures handle percpu
>> pointers differently before setup_per_cpu_areas(). x86 sets up the
>> offsets and stuff such that cpu0 can access the original percpu
>> section in the kernel image. ia64 sets up everything properly way
>> before setup_per_cpu_areas() and in some archs percpu pointers are
>> completely invalid before setup_per_cpu_areas(). So, percpu pointer
>> being handled in generic code which is being called before percpu
>> setup is a bit worrying.
>
> True but we are not dereferencing a per cpu pointer here. It is simply the
> assignment of the unreferenced native per cpu address generated by the
> linker. This address is unaffected by allocator bootstrap.
Yeap, the code is fine. Probably I'm just being a bit paranoid. If
you don't mind, can you please add a comment pointing out that the
percpu pointer isn't dereferenced before later initialization is done
which happens after percpu initialization?
> The assignment of the final per cpu areas (dynamically allocated) occurs
> after all the other memory allocators have been bootstrapped.
Great, thanks for the explanation.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-14 22:03 [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 1/8] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 3:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 15:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16 0:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 0:23 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 2/8] this_cpu ops: Remove pageset_notifier Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 3/8] Use this_cpu operations in slub Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 4/8] SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 5/8] this_cpu: Remove slub kmem_cache fields Christoph Lameter
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 6/8] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 6:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-15 14:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 14:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 4:03 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 22:41 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-16 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 0:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17 5:42 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-14 22:03 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 8/8] Remove cpu_local_xx macros Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 4:04 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 6:37 ` [this_cpu_xx V7 0/8] Per cpu atomics in core allocators and cleanup Pekka Enberg
2009-12-15 6:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-15 14:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:06 ` Mel Gorman
2009-12-16 14:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-16 21:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-15 17:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-16 0:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-16 1:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-16 1:46 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-17 13:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-17 20:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-17 20:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 0:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-18 0:27 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B297A0C.4060009@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome