From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, MCE, fix MSR_IA32_MCI_CTL2 CMCI threshold setup
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:26:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB06426.7070707@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269847000.1060.91.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
(2010/03/29 16:16), Huang Ying wrote:
> It is reported that CMCI is not raised when number of corrected error
> reaches preset threshold. After inspection, it is found that
> MSR_IA32_MCI_CTL2 threshold field is not setup properly. This patch
> fixed it.
>
> Reported-by: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> index 6c3fdd6..355f298 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@
> #define MCM_ADDR_MEM 3 /* memory address */
> #define MCM_ADDR_GENERIC 7 /* generic */
>
> +/* CTL2 register defines */
> +#define MCI_CTL2_THRESHOLD_MASK 0x7fff
> +
> #define MCJ_CTX_MASK 3
> #define MCJ_CTX(flags) ((flags) & MCJ_CTX_MASK)
> #define MCJ_CTX_RANDOM 0 /* inject context: random */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> index d15df6e..ffe730d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static void cmci_discover(int banks, int boot)
> continue;
> }
>
> + val &= ~MCI_CTL2_THRESHOLD_MASK;
> val |= CMCI_EN | CMCI_THRESHOLD;
> wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(i), val);
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(i), val);
Hum, it seems that the CTL2 of reported environment had
be initialized to have more than CMCI_THRESHOLD(=1) by
BIOS etc. Could you explain more about your inspection?
Maybe we could handle this environment if kernel supports
APEI's firmware-first for corrected MCE and if this is in
that case.
Patch looks good. How about cc-ing stable?
Reviewed-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Thanks,
H.Seto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-29 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-29 7:16 Huang Ying
2010-03-29 8:26 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2010-03-29 8:40 ` Huang Ying
2010-03-29 10:50 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-17 8:08 Huang Ying
2010-05-17 17:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 0:51 ` Huang Ying
2010-05-18 1:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB06426.7070707@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome