mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "felipe.balbi@nokia.com" <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>
Cc: "Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan" <madhu.cr@ti.com>,
	"me@felipebalbi.com" <me@felipebalbi.com>,
	"'kishore kadiyala'" <kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com>,
	"'Vimal Singh'" <vimal.newwork@gmail.com>,
	"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
	"S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Lavinen Jarkko (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's peformance.
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:55:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBB6767.7010202@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100406163211.GA29117@nokia.com>

Felipe Balbi had written, on 04/06/2010 11:32 AM, the following:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:16:01PM +0200, ext Madhusudhan wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:me@felipebalbi.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 12:01 AM
>>> To: Madhusudhan
>>> Cc: me@felipebalbi.com; 'kishore kadiyala'; 'Vimal Singh';
>>> tony@atomide.com; svenkatr@ti.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's
>>> peformance.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 12:19:29PM -0500, Madhusudhan wrote:
>>>> Since the first if command already checks for the 8-bit the second check
>>>> like >= 4 is definitely not readable in my opinion.
>>> how come ???
>>>
>>>> Functionally do you see anything wrong with this patch??
>>> functionally no, but (hypothetical situation) and if on
>>> omap4/5/6/whatever, omap controller supports a bigger bus width then
>>> you'll have to add a line like:
>>>
>>> +	if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 16)
>>> +		mmc->caps |= (MMC_CAP_16_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA |
>>> +				MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA);
>>> -	if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 8)
>>> +	else if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 8)
>>>
>>> do you see the problem ?? In my opinion it doesn't scale well.
>>>
>> The point we should note here is that MMC spec supports a max bus width of
>> 8-bit. So anything beyond 8-bit is not in the picture as of today.
> 
> in that case, the code could be:
> 
> WARN_ON(mmc_slot(host).wires > 8);
> 
> if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 8)
> 	mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 4)
> 	mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>
some reasons why i love switch statements ;) since I dont expect other 
than precisely 4 and 8 (do we expect 5,6,7 - i might be wrong).. but if 
it is so, wont the following be better?

switch (mmc_slot(host).wires)
{
case 8:
	mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
	/* fall thru*/
case 4:
	mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
		break;
default:
	WARN("bad width");
}	
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-06 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-11 14:20 [PATCH] " kishore kadiyala
2010-02-11 17:34 ` Madhusudhan
2010-03-31  6:07   ` [PATCH-V2] " kishore kadiyala
2010-03-31  6:27     ` Vimal Singh
2010-03-31  7:03       ` kishore kadiyala
2010-03-31 13:11         ` Jarkko Nikula
2010-03-31 16:37         ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-01  6:31           ` kishore kadiyala
2010-04-01 15:41             ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-05 12:56               ` [PATCH v3] " kishore kadiyala
2010-04-05 16:48                 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-05 17:19                   ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-05 17:43                     ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-06  5:00                     ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 16:16                       ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-06 16:32                         ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 16:55                           ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2010-04-06 16:57                             ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 23:23                               ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-06 23:39                                 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-04-07  0:16                                   ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-07  0:57                                     ` Nishanth Menon
2010-04-08 16:57                                       ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-19 15:36                                         ` [PATCH v4] " kishore kadiyala
2010-04-19 15:51                                           ` kishore kadiyala
2010-04-22  0:26                                             ` Madhusudhan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BBB6767.7010202@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=felipe.balbi@nokia.com \
    --cc=jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com \
    --cc=kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madhu.cr@ti.com \
    --cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
    --cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vimal.newwork@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome