mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
@ 2010-06-29 12:31 Kulikov Vasiliy
  2010-06-29 12:47 ` Nicolas Palix
  2010-06-29 12:57 ` Nicolas Palix
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kulikov Vasiliy @ 2010-06-29 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: trivial
  Cc: Randy Dunlap, Julia Lawall, Nicolas Palix, Michal Marek,
	linux-kernel, linux-doc

10.04 is Lucid, not Karmic.

Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/coccinelle.txt |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/coccinelle.txt b/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
index ba3315d..cd2b028 100644
--- a/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
+++ b/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ of many distributions, e.g. :
 
  - Debian (>=squeeze)
  - Fedora (>=13)
- - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Karmic Koala)
+ - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
  - OpenSUSE
  - Arch Linux
  - NetBSD
-- 
1.7.0.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
  2010-06-29 12:31 [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name Kulikov Vasiliy
@ 2010-06-29 12:47 ` Nicolas Palix
  2010-06-29 12:59   ` Kulikov Vasiliy
  2010-06-29 12:57 ` Nicolas Palix
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Palix @ 2010-06-29 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kulikov Vasiliy
  Cc: trivial, Randy Dunlap, Julia Lawall, Michal Marek, linux-kernel,
	linux-doc

Hi Kulikov,

Indeed. I mixed things.

But Coccinelle was already in Karmic [1].
Can you submit a patch with 9.10 instead of 10.04 ?

I will Ack it.

Thanks.

[1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coccinelle

On Tuesday 29 June 2010 14:31:16 Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> 10.04 is Lucid, not Karmic.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/coccinelle.txt |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/coccinelle.txt b/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
> index ba3315d..cd2b028 100644
> --- a/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ of many distributions, e.g. :
>  
>   - Debian (>=squeeze)
>   - Fedora (>=13)
> - - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Karmic Koala)
> + - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
>   - OpenSUSE
>   - Arch Linux
>   - NetBSD
> 

-- 
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
  2010-06-29 12:31 [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name Kulikov Vasiliy
  2010-06-29 12:47 ` Nicolas Palix
@ 2010-06-29 12:57 ` Nicolas Palix
  2010-06-29 13:28   ` Michal Marek
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Palix @ 2010-06-29 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kulikov Vasiliy
  Cc: trivial, Randy Dunlap, Julia Lawall, Michal Marek, linux-kernel,
	linux-doc


The version in Karmic is too old. The right correction is indeed Lucid Lynx.

On Tuesday 29 June 2010 14:31:16 Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> 10.04 is Lucid, not Karmic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/coccinelle.txt |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/coccinelle.txt b/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
> index ba3315d..cd2b028 100644
> --- a/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ of many distributions, e.g. :
>  
>   - Debian (>=squeeze)
>   - Fedora (>=13)
> - - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Karmic Koala)
> + - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
>   - OpenSUSE
>   - Arch Linux
>   - NetBSD
> 

Acked-by: Nicolas Palix <npalix@diku.dk>

-- 
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
  2010-06-29 12:47 ` Nicolas Palix
@ 2010-06-29 12:59   ` Kulikov Vasiliy
  2010-06-29 13:01     ` Jiri Kosina
  2010-06-29 13:19     ` Nicolas Palix
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kulikov Vasiliy @ 2010-06-29 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicolas Palix, k
  Cc: trivial, Randy Dunlap, Julia Lawall, Michal Marek, linux-kernel,
	linux-doc

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 14:47 +0200, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> Hi Kulikov,
> 
> Indeed. I mixed things.
> 
> But Coccinelle was already in Karmic [1].
> Can you submit a patch with 9.10 instead of 10.04 ?
> 
> I will Ack it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coccinelle

As you see in [1], coccinelle version in Karmic is 0.1.9.
I don't know if it is buggy for linux.

In documentation it is 0.2.0:
> Coccinelle (>=0.2.0) is available through the package manager
> of many distributions, e.g. :
> 
>  - Debian (>=squeeze)
>  - Fedora (>=13)
>  - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
>  - OpenSUSE
>  - Arch Linux
>  - NetBSD
>  - FreeBSD

So, if 0.1.9 is OK, I can make smth like this: 
>  - Ubuntu (>=9.04 Karmic Koala, coccinelle = 0.1.9)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
  2010-06-29 12:59   ` Kulikov Vasiliy
@ 2010-06-29 13:01     ` Jiri Kosina
  2010-06-29 13:36       ` Nicolas Palix
  2010-06-29 13:19     ` Nicolas Palix
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2010-06-29 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kulikov Vasiliy
  Cc: Nicolas Palix, k, Randy Dunlap, Julia Lawall, Michal Marek,
	linux-kernel, linux-doc

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:

> > Indeed. I mixed things.
> > 
> > But Coccinelle was already in Karmic [1].
> > Can you submit a patch with 9.10 instead of 10.04 ?
> > 
> > I will Ack it.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coccinelle
> 
> As you see in [1], coccinelle version in Karmic is 0.1.9.
> I don't know if it is buggy for linux.
> 
> In documentation it is 0.2.0:
> > Coccinelle (>=0.2.0) is available through the package manager
> > of many distributions, e.g. :
> > 
> >  - Debian (>=squeeze)
> >  - Fedora (>=13)
> >  - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
> >  - OpenSUSE
> >  - Arch Linux
> >  - NetBSD
> >  - FreeBSD
> 
> So, if 0.1.9 is OK, I can make smth like this: 
> >  - Ubuntu (>=9.04 Karmic Koala, coccinelle = 0.1.9)

Do we really want all this in kernel documentation in the first place?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
  2010-06-29 12:59   ` Kulikov Vasiliy
  2010-06-29 13:01     ` Jiri Kosina
@ 2010-06-29 13:19     ` Nicolas Palix
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Palix @ 2010-06-29 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kulikov Vasiliy
  Cc: k, trivial, Randy Dunlap, Julia Lawall, Michal Marek,
	linux-kernel, linux-doc


On Tuesday 29 June 2010 14:59:01 Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 14:47 +0200, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> > Hi Kulikov,
> > 
> > Indeed. I mixed things.
> > 
> > But Coccinelle was already in Karmic [1].
> > Can you submit a patch with 9.10 instead of 10.04 ?
> > 
> > I will Ack it.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coccinelle
> 
> As you see in [1], coccinelle version in Karmic is 0.1.9.
> I don't know if it is buggy for linux.
> 
> In documentation it is 0.2.0:
> > Coccinelle (>=0.2.0) is available through the package manager
> > of many distributions, e.g. :
> > 
> >  - Debian (>=squeeze)
> >  - Fedora (>=13)
> >  - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
> >  - OpenSUSE
> >  - Arch Linux
> >  - NetBSD
> >  - FreeBSD
> 
> So, if 0.1.9 is OK, I can make smth like this: 
> >  - Ubuntu (>=9.04 Karmic Koala, coccinelle = 0.1.9)
> 

I figured out that point later, and sent a Acked-by for your original patch.
I think our mails have crossed each other.

Indeed, the version 0.1.9 does not provide the virtual rule feature, which is required
for the coccinelle files we have submitted.

-- 
Nicolas Palix
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
  2010-06-29 12:57 ` Nicolas Palix
@ 2010-06-29 13:28   ` Michal Marek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michal Marek @ 2010-06-29 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicolas Palix
  Cc: Kulikov Vasiliy, trivial, Randy Dunlap, Julia Lawall,
	linux-kernel, linux-doc

On 29.6.2010 14:57, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> 
> The version in Karmic is too old. The right correction is indeed Lucid Lynx.
> 
> On Tuesday 29 June 2010 14:31:16 Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
>> 10.04 is Lucid, not Karmic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/coccinelle.txt |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/coccinelle.txt b/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
>> index ba3315d..cd2b028 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/coccinelle.txt
>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ of many distributions, e.g. :
>>  
>>   - Debian (>=squeeze)
>>   - Fedora (>=13)
>> - - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Karmic Koala)
>> + - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
>>   - OpenSUSE
>>   - Arch Linux
>>   - NetBSD
>>
> 
> Acked-by: Nicolas Palix <npalix@diku.dk>

Applied.

Michal

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name
  2010-06-29 13:01     ` Jiri Kosina
@ 2010-06-29 13:36       ` Nicolas Palix
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Palix @ 2010-06-29 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Kosina
  Cc: Kulikov Vasiliy, k, Randy Dunlap, Julia Lawall, Michal Marek,
	linux-kernel, linux-doc

On Tuesday 29 June 2010 15:01:14 Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> 
> > > Indeed. I mixed things.
> > > 
> > > But Coccinelle was already in Karmic [1].
> > > Can you submit a patch with 9.10 instead of 10.04 ?
> > > 
> > > I will Ack it.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coccinelle
> > 
> > As you see in [1], coccinelle version in Karmic is 0.1.9.
> > I don't know if it is buggy for linux.
> > 
> > In documentation it is 0.2.0:
> > > Coccinelle (>=0.2.0) is available through the package manager
> > > of many distributions, e.g. :
> > > 
> > >  - Debian (>=squeeze)
> > >  - Fedora (>=13)
> > >  - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx)
> > >  - OpenSUSE
> > >  - Arch Linux
> > >  - NetBSD
> > >  - FreeBSD
> > 
> > So, if 0.1.9 is OK, I can make smth like this: 
> > >  - Ubuntu (>=9.04 Karmic Koala, coccinelle = 0.1.9)
> 
> Do we really want all this in kernel documentation in the first place?
> 

It addresses a comment [1] I got during the review process.

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/10/316

> 

-- 
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-29 13:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-29 12:31 [PATCH] Documentation: fix ubuntu distro name Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-06-29 12:47 ` Nicolas Palix
2010-06-29 12:59   ` Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-06-29 13:01     ` Jiri Kosina
2010-06-29 13:36       ` Nicolas Palix
2010-06-29 13:19     ` Nicolas Palix
2010-06-29 12:57 ` Nicolas Palix
2010-06-29 13:28   ` Michal Marek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome