From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
TuxOnIce-devel <tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Nigel's current for-rafael queue
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:21:05 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9E67C1.5030202@tuxonice.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009251704.50186.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Hi again.
(I know from your more recent email that you already know the answer to
this, but others might be interested so I'll reply anyway).
On 26/09/10 01:04, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Samstag 25 September 2010 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
>> Hi Rafael.
>
> Hi Nigel,
>
>> Please find attached a slightly updated version of the patchset I sent
>> a few months ago. The main change is that I've prepended and additional
>> patch which lets the user see the speed at which the image is being
>> read and written. This is accomplished by recording the MB/s in a
>> single byte in the image header, and using a couple of __nosavedata
>> variables to get the data back through the atomic restore. I realise
>> the char limits us to 255MB/s at the moment. In future patches, I
>> intend to address this by storing the data in a 'proper' image header
>> (it's a real problem - TuxOnIce reads and writes on the same set up at
>> speeds around 250MB/s).
>
> I like to help by testing these. Is it sufficient to check out your latest
> tuxonice tree, checkout branch for-rafael and switch the hibernate script
> to TryMethod disk.conf?
Yes, that should be sufficient. You do need to be aware (as I said in
the other reply) that I'm treating this branch like a temporary branch,
so it's getting rebased and having little modifications made to it.
Pulling will therefore sometimes require the use of the force option.
Regards,
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-25 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-25 4:16 Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 01/22] Record & display i/o speed post resume Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 02/22] Hibernation: Swap iteration functions Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 03/22] Hibernation: Move root_swap declaration Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 04/22] Hibernation: Add mass swap allocation routine Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 05/22] Hibernation: Switch to preallocating swap Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-25 21:32 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 06/22] Hiberation: Fix speed display Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 07/22] Hibernation: Generic extents support Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 08/22] Hibernation: Iterate over sectors not swap entries Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 09/22] Hibernation: Stop passing swap_map_handle struct Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 10/22] Hibernation: Stop passing bio_chain around Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 11/22] Hibernation: Move block i/o fns to block_io.c Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 12/22] Hibernation: Partial page I/O support Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 13/22] Hibernation: Extent save/load routines Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 14/22] Hibernation: Store block extents at start of image Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 15/22] Hibernation: Use block extents for reading image Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 16/22] Remove first_sector from swap_map_handle Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:16 ` [PATCH 17/22] Hibernation: Replace bio chain Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:17 ` [PATCH 18/22] Hibernation: Remove swap_map_pages Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:17 ` [PATCH 19/22] Hibernation: Remove wait_on_bio_chain result Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:17 ` [PATCH 20/22] Hibernation: Prepare for handle.cur removal Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:17 ` [PATCH 21/22] Hibernation: Remove swap_map structure Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 4:17 ` [PATCH 22/22] Hibernation: Remove now-empty routines Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 15:04 ` [linux-pm] Nigel's current for-rafael queue Martin Steigerwald
2010-09-25 21:21 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2010-09-25 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-25 22:33 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-25 22:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-28 10:34 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] " Martin Steigerwald
2010-09-30 7:52 ` unable to handle paging request at resume (was: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] Nigel's current for-rafael queue) Martin Steigerwald
2010-10-02 16:51 ` [linux-pm] " Martin Steigerwald
2010-09-28 19:45 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] Nigel's current for-rafael queue Martin Steigerwald
2010-09-28 21:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-09-30 7:56 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C9E67C1.5030202@tuxonice.net \
--to=nigel@tuxonice.net \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®