From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
lwoodman@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing - fix recursive user stack trace
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:13:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDB3538.4080605@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289390172-9730-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
Jiri Olsa wrote:
> The user stack trace can fault when examining the trace. Which
> would call the do_page_fault handler, which would trace again,
> which would do the user stack trace, which would fault and call
> do_page_fault again ...
>
> Thus this is causing a recursive bug. We need to have a recursion
> detector here.
>
I guess this is from what I reported to Redhat, triggered by
the ftrace stress test. ;)
This patch should be the first patch, otherwise you introduce
a regression. Though it merely a problem in this case, better
avoid it.
A nitpick below:
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 82d9b81..0215e87 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -1284,6 +1284,8 @@ void trace_dump_stack(void)
> __ftrace_trace_stack(global_trace.buffer, flags, 3, preempt_count());
> }
>
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count);
> +
> void
> ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc)
> {
> @@ -1302,6 +1304,18 @@ ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc)
> if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * prevent recursion, since the user stack tracing may
> + * trigger other kernel events.
> + */
> + preempt_disable();
> + if (__get_cpu_var(user_stack_count))
> + goto out;
> +
> + __get_cpu_var(user_stack_count)++;
> +
> +
> +
redundant blank lines.
> event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_USER_STACK,
> sizeof(*entry), flags, pc);
> if (!event)
> @@ -1319,6 +1333,11 @@ ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc)
> save_stack_trace_user(&trace);
> if (!filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event))
> ring_buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event);
> +
> + __get_cpu_var(user_stack_count)--;
> +
> + out:
> + preempt_enable();
> }
>
> #ifdef UNUSED
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-11 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 11:56 [PATCH 0/2] tracing,mm - add kernel pagefault tracepoint for x86 & x86_64 Jiri Olsa
2010-11-10 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jiri Olsa
2010-11-10 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-10 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-11-10 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-10 15:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-10 15:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-11-10 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-10 16:28 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-10 16:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-11 9:09 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] " Jiri Olsa
2010-11-11 9:09 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] tracing - fix recursive user stack trace Jiri Olsa
2010-11-11 10:34 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 9:09 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] tracing,mm - add kernel pagefault tracepoint for x86 & x86_64 Jiri Olsa
2010-11-11 12:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-11 13:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-11-15 13:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-15 14:06 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-15 14:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-15 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-15 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-16 9:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-11-16 13:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-10 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing - fix recursive user stack trace Jiri Olsa
2010-11-11 0:13 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2010-11-11 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-18 14:05 ` [tip:perf/core] tracing: Fix " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDB3538.4080605@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome