From: tip-bot for Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, srostedt@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, jolsa@redhat.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] tracing: Fix recursive user stack trace
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:05:04 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-91e86e560d0b3ce4c5fc64fd2bbb99f856a30a4e@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289390172-9730-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
Commit-ID: 91e86e560d0b3ce4c5fc64fd2bbb99f856a30a4e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/91e86e560d0b3ce4c5fc64fd2bbb99f856a30a4e
Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:56:12 +0100
Committer: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:20:08 -0500
tracing: Fix recursive user stack trace
The user stack trace can fault when examining the trace. Which
would call the do_page_fault handler, which would trace again,
which would do the user stack trace, which would fault and call
do_page_fault again ...
Thus this is causing a recursive bug. We need to have a recursion
detector here.
[ Resubmitted by Jiri Olsa ]
[ Eric Dumazet recommended using __this_cpu_* instead of __get_cpu_* ]
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <1289390172-9730-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 82d9b81..ee6a733 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1284,6 +1284,8 @@ void trace_dump_stack(void)
__ftrace_trace_stack(global_trace.buffer, flags, 3, preempt_count());
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count);
+
void
ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc)
{
@@ -1302,6 +1304,18 @@ ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc)
if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
return;
+ /*
+ * prevent recursion, since the user stack tracing may
+ * trigger other kernel events.
+ */
+ preempt_disable();
+ if (__this_cpu_read(user_stack_count))
+ goto out;
+
+ __this_cpu_inc(user_stack_count);
+
+
+
event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_USER_STACK,
sizeof(*entry), flags, pc);
if (!event)
@@ -1319,6 +1333,11 @@ ftrace_trace_userstack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long flags, int pc)
save_stack_trace_user(&trace);
if (!filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event))
ring_buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event);
+
+ __this_cpu_dec(user_stack_count);
+
+ out:
+ preempt_enable();
}
#ifdef UNUSED
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-18 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 11:56 [PATCH 0/2] tracing,mm - add kernel pagefault tracepoint for x86 & x86_64 Jiri Olsa
2010-11-10 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jiri Olsa
2010-11-10 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-10 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-11-10 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-10 15:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-10 15:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-11-10 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-10 16:28 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-10 16:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-11 9:09 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] " Jiri Olsa
2010-11-11 9:09 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] tracing - fix recursive user stack trace Jiri Olsa
2010-11-11 10:34 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 9:09 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] tracing,mm - add kernel pagefault tracepoint for x86 & x86_64 Jiri Olsa
2010-11-11 12:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-11 13:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-11-15 13:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-15 14:06 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-15 14:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-15 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-15 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-16 9:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-11-16 13:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-10 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing - fix recursive user stack trace Jiri Olsa
2010-11-11 0:13 ` Li Zefan
2010-11-11 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-18 14:05 ` tip-bot for Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-91e86e560d0b3ce4c5fc64fd2bbb99f856a30a4e@git.kernel.org \
--to=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome