From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: <dsd@laptop.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: your patch "x86, olpc: Rework BIOS signature check"
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:18:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CEFC1AA0200007800024734@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
... adds a select of OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE to the OLPC option,
which contradicts OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE itself depending on
!X86_64 && !X86_PAE. Are the latter dependencies not necessary
anymore (the X86_64 one wasn't very meaningful anyway, since
these options all sit inside a "if X86_32"), or should the select be
conditional?
Also, how meaningful is having OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE on but OLPC
off (i.e. can OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE perhaps go away altogether)?
Thanks, Jan
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-26 13:18 Jan Beulich [this message]
2010-11-26 20:34 ` Daniel Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CEFC1AA0200007800024734@vpn.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®