mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* your patch "x86, olpc: Rework BIOS signature check"
@ 2010-11-26 13:18 Jan Beulich
  2010-11-26 20:34 ` Daniel Drake
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2010-11-26 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dsd; +Cc: linux-kernel, hpa

... adds a select of OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE to the OLPC option,
which contradicts OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE itself depending on
!X86_64 && !X86_PAE. Are the latter dependencies not necessary
anymore (the X86_64 one wasn't very meaningful anyway, since
these options all sit inside a "if X86_32"), or should the select be
conditional?

Also, how meaningful is having OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE on but OLPC
off (i.e. can OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE perhaps go away altogether)?

Thanks, Jan


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-26 20:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-26 13:18 your patch "x86, olpc: Rework BIOS signature check" Jan Beulich
2010-11-26 20:34 ` Daniel Drake

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®