mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw  in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:43:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CFFD1C2.1080108@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291820356.28378.83.camel@laptop>

On 12/08/2010 06:59 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
>>> I wonder if you should reverse these checks.  If the bios has the perf
>>> counter enabled, there might be a high chance that it fails the first
>>> check and never gets to the actually bios checks.
>>
>> Ah, good point. 
> 
> Something like so..
> 
> ---
> Subject: perf, x86: Detect broken BIOSes
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Date: Wed Dec 08 15:56:23 CET 2010
> 
> Some BIOSes use PMU resources, this is a bug.
> 
> Try to detect this, warn about it, and further refuse to touch the
> PMU ourselves.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -375,15 +375,51 @@ static void release_pmc_hardware(void) {
>  static bool check_hw_exists(void)
>  {
>  	u64 val, val_new = 0;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int i, reg, ret = 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Check to see if the BIOS enabled any of the counters, if so
> +	 * complain and bail.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.num_counters; i++) {
> +		reg = x86_pmu.eventsel + i;
> +		ret = rdmsrl_safe(reg, &val);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto msr_fail;
> +		if (val & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE)
> +			goto bios_fail;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed; i++) {
> +		reg = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL;
> +		ret = rdmsrl_safe(reg, &val);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto msr_fail;
> +		if (val & (0x03 << i*4))
> +			goto bios_fail;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Now write a value and read it back to see if it matches,
> +	 * this is needed to detect certain hardware emulators (qemu/kvm)
> +	 * that don't trap on the MSR access and always return 0s.
> +	 */
>  	val = 0xabcdUL;
> -	ret |= checking_wrmsrl(x86_pmu.perfctr, val);
> +	ret = checking_wrmsrl(x86_pmu.perfctr, val);
>  	ret |= rdmsrl_safe(x86_pmu.perfctr, &val_new);
>  	if (ret || val != val_new)
> -		return false;
> +		goto msr_fail;
>  
>  	return true;
> +
> +bios_fail:
> +	printk(KERN_CONT "Broken BIOS detected, software events only.\n");
> +	printk(KERN_ERR FW_BUG "invalid MSR: %x=%Lx\n", reg, val);
> +	return false;
> +
> +msr_fail:
> +	printk(KERN_CONT "Broken PMU hardware detected, software events only.\n");
> +	return false;
>  }

can you add sth force_... in command line to take over ownership of perf from BIOS or previous kernel ?

then still can use perf etc after we kexec from RHEL or SLES kernel to later kernel ( from 2.6.37)

Thanks

Yinghai

>  
>  static void reserve_ds_buffers(void);
> @@ -1378,10 +1414,8 @@ int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>  	pmu_check_apic();
>  
>  	/* sanity check that the hardware exists or is emulated */
> -	if (!check_hw_exists()) {
> -		pr_cont("Broken PMU hardware detected, software events only.\n");
> +	if (!check_hw_exists())
>  		return 0;
> -	}
>  
>  	pr_cont("%s PMU driver.\n", x86_pmu.name);
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-08 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-01  8:00 Yinghai Lu
2010-12-01 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:06   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 16:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:23       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:46           ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:49             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:58               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 20:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:48                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-02  5:23                     ` Don Zickus
2010-12-02  7:34                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-02 16:15                         ` Don Zickus
2010-12-07 23:30                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:01                             ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 14:20                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:42                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 14:48                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:02                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 15:15                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:22                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 21:16                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-08 14:59                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 18:43                                   ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-12-08 19:01                                     ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 19:05                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:17                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:06                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 22:37                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 23:20                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-09  4:34                                       ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:20                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:44                                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-08 14:33                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:39                               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-07 21:16                         ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08  0:26                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 10:39                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 20:41               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CFFD1C2.1080108@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome