mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] x86_32 cleanup: KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE
@ 2011-02-27 21:21 Stratos Psomadakis
  2011-02-27 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] Remove KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE for x86_32 code(no longer used) Stratos Psomadakis
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2011-02-27 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Stratos Psomadakis

I noticed that KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE is no longer used by x86_32 code
(head_32.S no longer uses it for the initial kernel mapping).

We can thus remove the assert from the vmlinux.lds.S file, and 
remove it completely for x86_32 code. 

Since head_32.S doesn't use it anymore, I can't find a reason 
why we should impose such a limit on the kernel image size
(although a 512+MB kernel image isn't what one would call a realistic
scenario :P)

I think that a limit on the size of the image is imposed anyway
by decompress_kernel()(if I understood correctly).

I also updated the comments in head_32.S which still had references
to KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-28 19:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-27 21:21 [PATCH 0/2] x86_32 cleanup: KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE Stratos Psomadakis
2011-02-27 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] Remove KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE for x86_32 code(no longer used) Stratos Psomadakis
2011-02-27 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] head_32.S: Update the comments for the initial kernel mapping(KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE no " Stratos Psomadakis
2011-02-28 19:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86_32 cleanup: KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE Stratos Psomadakis

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome