mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Why is max_cstate=1 still needed?
@ 2011-03-11 12:18 Jiri Slaby
  2011-03-11 14:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2011-03-11 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Len Brown
  Cc: linux-pm, x86, Linux kernel mailing list, Thomas Gleixner, Jiri Slaby

Hello,

there are still reports against the latest kernels, that people need to
pass processor/intel_idle.max_cstate=1 to successfully boot the kernel.
The symptoms are always the same, until the parameter is specified OR
until the user presses a key, the system won't boot up.

This started to appear between 2.6.31 and 2.6.34 (possibly a 2.6.33
regression) and continues to be reported against the latest stable
2.6.37.3. For example:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15289
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579932
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675161

I see that there were some fixes in .38-rc in this bug report (they look
unrelated):
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29992

Should they give .38-rc a try?

Any help would be appreciated.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-11 14:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-11 12:18 Why is max_cstate=1 still needed? Jiri Slaby
2011-03-11 14:02 ` Thomas Gleixner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®