mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	patches@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3 RFC paul/rcu/srcu] srcu: flip only once for every grace period
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:29:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F44B580.6040003@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120221172442.GG2375@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

>From 4ddf62aaf2c4ebe6b9d4a1c596e8b43a678f1f0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:12:02 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 3/3 RFC paul/rcu/srcu] srcu: flip only once for every grace period

flip_idx_and_wait() is not changed, and is split as two functions
and only a short comments is added for smp_mb() E.

__synchronize_srcu() use a different algorithm for "leak" readers.
detail is in the comments of the patch.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/srcu.c |  105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/srcu.c b/kernel/srcu.c
index a51ac48..346f9d7 100644
--- a/kernel/srcu.c
+++ b/kernel/srcu.c
@@ -249,6 +249,37 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock);
  */
 #define SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_READER_DELAY 5
 
+static void wait_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx, bool expedited)
+{
+	int trycount = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * SRCU read-side critical sections are normally short, so wait
+	 * a small amount of time before possibly blocking.
+	 */
+	if (!srcu_readers_active_idx_check(sp, idx)) {
+		udelay(SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_READER_DELAY);
+		while (!srcu_readers_active_idx_check(sp, idx)) {
+			if (expedited && ++ trycount < 10)
+				udelay(SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_READER_DELAY);
+			else
+				schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
+		}
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The following smp_mb() E pairs with srcu_read_unlock()'s
+	 * smp_mb C to ensure that if srcu_readers_active_idx_check()
+	 * sees srcu_read_unlock()'s counter decrement, then any
+	 * of the current task's subsequent code will happen after
+	 * that SRCU read-side critical section.
+	 *
+	 * It also ensures the order between the above waiting and
+	 * the next flipping.
+	 */
+	smp_mb(); /* E */
+}
+
 /*
  * Flip the readers' index by incrementing ->completed, then wait
  * until there are no more readers using the counters referenced by
@@ -258,12 +289,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock);
  * Of course, it is possible that a reader might be delayed for the
  * full duration of flip_idx_and_wait() between fetching the
  * index and incrementing its counter.  This possibility is handled
- * by __synchronize_srcu() invoking flip_idx_and_wait() twice.
+ * by the next __synchronize_srcu() invoking wait_idx() for such readers
+ * before start a new grace perioad.
  */
 static void flip_idx_and_wait(struct srcu_struct *sp, bool expedited)
 {
 	int idx;
-	int trycount = 0;
 
 	idx = sp->completed++ & 0x1;
 
@@ -278,28 +309,7 @@ static void flip_idx_and_wait(struct srcu_struct *sp, bool expedited)
 	 */
 	smp_mb(); /* D */
 
-	/*
-	 * SRCU read-side critical sections are normally short, so wait
-	 * a small amount of time before possibly blocking.
-	 */
-	if (!srcu_readers_active_idx_check(sp, idx)) {
-		udelay(SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_READER_DELAY);
-		while (!srcu_readers_active_idx_check(sp, idx)) {
-			if (expedited && ++ trycount < 10)
-				udelay(SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_READER_DELAY);
-			else
-				schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
-		}
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * The following smp_mb() E pairs with srcu_read_unlock()'s
-	 * smp_mb C to ensure that if srcu_readers_active_idx_check()
-	 * sees srcu_read_unlock()'s counter decrement, then any
-	 * of the current task's subsequent code will happen after
-	 * that SRCU read-side critical section.
-	 */
-	smp_mb(); /* E */
+	wait_idx(sp, idx, expedited);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -307,8 +317,6 @@ static void flip_idx_and_wait(struct srcu_struct *sp, bool expedited)
  */
 static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, bool expedited)
 {
-	int idx = 0;
-
 	rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&sp->dep_map) &&
 			   !lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) &&
 			   !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) &&
@@ -318,27 +326,42 @@ static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, bool expedited)
 	mutex_lock(&sp->mutex);
 
 	/*
-	 * If there were no helpers, then we need to do two flips of
-	 * the index.  The first flip is required if there are any
-	 * outstanding SRCU readers even if there are no new readers
-	 * running concurrently with the first counter flip.
-	 *
-	 * The second flip is required when a new reader picks up
+	 * When in the previous grace perioad, if a reader picks up
 	 * the old value of the index, but does not increment its
 	 * counter until after its counters is summed/rechecked by
-	 * srcu_readers_active_idx_check().  In this case, the current SRCU
+	 * srcu_readers_active_idx_check(). In this case, the previous SRCU
 	 * grace period would be OK because the SRCU read-side critical
-	 * section started after this SRCU grace period started, so the
+	 * section started after the SRCU grace period started, so the
 	 * grace period is not required to wait for the reader.
 	 *
-	 * However, the next SRCU grace period would be waiting for the
-	 * other set of counters to go to zero, and therefore would not
-	 * wait for the reader, which would be very bad.  To avoid this
-	 * bad scenario, we flip and wait twice, clearing out both sets
-	 * of counters.
+	 * However, such leftover readers affect this new SRCU grace period.
+	 * So we have to wait for such readers. This wait_idx() should be
+	 * considerred as the wait_idx() in the flip_idx_and_wait() of
+	 * the previous grace perioad except that it is for leftover readers
+	 * started before this synchronize_srcu(). So when it returns,
+	 * there is no leftover readers that starts before this grace period.
+	 *
+	 * If there are some leftover readers that do not increment its
+	 * counter until after its counters is summed/rechecked by
+	 * srcu_readers_active_idx_check(), In this case, this SRCU
+	 * grace period would be OK as above comments says. We defines
+	 * such readers as leftover-leftover readers, we consider these
+	 * readers fteched index of (sp->completed + 1), it means they
+	 * are considerred as exactly the same as the readers after this
+	 * grace period.
+	 *
+	 * wait_idx() is expected very fast, because leftover readers
+	 * are unlikely produced.
 	 */
-	for (; idx < 2; idx++)
-		flip_idx_and_wait(sp, expedited);
+	wait_idx(sp, (sp->completed - 1) & 0x1, expedited);
+
+	/*
+	 * Starts a new grace period, this flip is required if there are
+	 * any outstanding SRCU readers even if there are no new readers
+	 * running concurrently with the counter flip.
+	 */
+	flip_idx_and_wait(sp, expedited);
+
 	mutex_unlock(&sp->mutex);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.4.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-22  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-13  2:09 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] rcu: direct algorithmic SRCU implementation Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-15 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-16  6:35   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-16 10:50     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-16 10:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-16 11:14         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-15 14:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-15 14:51   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-16  6:38     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-16 11:00       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-16 11:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-16 12:18           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-16 12:44             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-16 14:52               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-16 14:58                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-16 15:13               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-20  7:15 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-20 17:44   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-21  1:11     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-21  1:50       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-21  8:44         ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-21 17:24           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-22  9:29             ` [PATCH 1/3 RFC paul/rcu/srcu] srcu: Remove fast check path Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-22  9:29             ` [PATCH 2/3 RFC paul/rcu/srcu] srcu: only increase the upper bit for srcu_read_lock() Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-22  9:50               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-22 21:20               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-22 21:26                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-22 21:39                   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-23  1:01                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-22  9:29             ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2012-02-23  1:01               ` [PATCH 3/3 RFC paul/rcu/srcu] srcu: flip only once for every grace period Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-24  8:06               ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-24 20:01                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-27  8:01                   ` [PATCH 1/2 RFC] srcu: change the comments of the wait algorithm Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-27  8:01                   ` [PATCH 2/2 RFC] srcu: implement Peter's checking algorithm Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-27 18:30                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-28  1:51                       ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-28 13:47                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-29 10:07                           ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-02-29 13:55                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-01  2:31                               ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-01 13:20                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-10  3:41                                   ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06  8:42             ` [RFC PATCH 0/6 paul/rcu/srcu] srcu: implement call_srcu() Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06  9:57               ` [PATCH 1/6] remove unused srcu_barrier() Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06  9:57                 ` [PATCH 2/6] Don't touch the snap in srcu_readers_active() Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-08 19:14                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-06  9:57                 ` [PATCH 3/6] use "int trycount" instead of "bool expedited" Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-08 19:25                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-06  9:57                 ` [PATCH 4/6] remove flip_idx_and_wait() Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06 10:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-07  3:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 5/5 single-thread-version] implement per-domain single-thread state machine call_srcu() Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-08 13:04                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-08 14:17                       ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-08 13:08                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-08 20:35                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-10  3:16                       ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-12 18:03                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14  7:47                           ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-04-10 20:15                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-06  9:57                 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] implement per-cpu&per-domain " Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06 10:47                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-08 19:44                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-06 10:58                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 15:17                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06 15:38                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-08 19:49                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-10 10:12                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 17:52                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-06 11:16                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 15:12                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06 15:34                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-08 19:58                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-10  3:32                           ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-10 10:09                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 17:54                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-12 17:58                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 18:32                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-12 20:25                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 23:15                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-12 23:18                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 23:38                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-06 15:26                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06 15:37                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 11:17                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 11:22                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 11:35                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 11:36                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 11:39                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 14:50                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06 11:52                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 14:44                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06 15:31                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 15:32                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-07  6:44                         ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-07  8:10                       ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-03-07  9:21                         ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06 14:47                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-06  9:57                 ` [PATCH 6/6] add srcu torture test Lai Jiangshan
2012-03-08 19:03                 ` [PATCH 1/6] remove unused srcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F44B580.6040003@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome