From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
frank.arnold@amd.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mce] x86/bitops: Move BIT_64() for a wider use
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:31:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBD10D5.6080602@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337790571.9783.28.camel@laptop>
>>
>> Actually we need a BIT() macro that works both
>> on 32- and 64-bit. But that won't be that easy:
>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1010.1/02335.html
>>
>> And it should return UL for shift values < 32 and ULL otherwise.
>
Why do you want that behavior? That seems bizarre...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-23 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-22 10:53 [PATCH 1/2] x86, bitops: Move BIT_64 " Borislav Petkov
2012-05-22 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, MCE: Fix 32-bit build Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 16:08 ` [tip:x86/mce] x86/mce: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-23 16:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 16:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-23 16:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-23 16:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 16:07 ` [tip:x86/mce] x86/bitops: Move BIT_64() for a wider use tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-23 16:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-23 16:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-23 16:31 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-05-23 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-23 16:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-23 16:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-23 16:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 17:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-23 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-23 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 16:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-23 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBD10D5.6080602@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=frank.arnold@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome