From: "chenxiaosong (A)" <chenxiaosong2@huawei.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
"anna@kernel.org" <anna@kernel.org>,
"smayhew@redhat.com" <smayhew@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"liuyongqiang13@huawei.com" <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"yi.zhang@huawei.com" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
"zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com" <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>,
<smayhew@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] nfs: nfs{,4}_file_flush should consume writeback error
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 21:46:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a8e21fb-d8bf-5428-67e5-41c47529e641@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <037054f5ac2cd13e59db14b12f4ab430f1ddef5d.camel@hammerspace.com>
在 2022/3/6 23:08, Trond Myklebust 写道:
>
> Just to clarify a little.
>
> I don't see a need to consume the writeback errors on close(), unless
> other filesystems do the same. If the intention is that fsync() should
> see _all_ errors that haven't already been seen, then NFS should follow
> the same semantics as all the other filesystems.
>
Other filesystem will _not_ clear writeback error on close().
And other filesystem will _not_ clear writeback error on async write() too.
Other filesystem _only_ clear writeback error on fsync() or sync write().
Should NFS follow the same semantics as all the other filesystems?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-12 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-05 12:46 [PATCH -next 0/2] nfs: check writeback errors correctly ChenXiaoSong
2022-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH -next 1/2] nfs: nfs{,4}_file_flush should consume writeback error ChenXiaoSong
2022-03-05 16:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-03-06 3:54 ` chenxiaosong (A)
2022-03-06 14:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-03-06 15:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-04-12 13:46 ` chenxiaosong (A) [this message]
2022-04-12 13:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-04-12 14:12 ` chenxiaosong (A)
2022-04-12 14:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-04-20 8:50 ` chenxiaosong (A)
2022-05-09 7:43 ` chenxiaosong (A)
2022-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH -next 2/2] nfs: nfs_file_write() check writeback errors correctly ChenXiaoSong
2022-03-05 17:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-03-06 8:50 ` chenxiaosong (A)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a8e21fb-d8bf-5428-67e5-41c47529e641@huawei.com \
--to=chenxiaosong2@huawei.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyongqiang13@huawei.com \
--cc=smayhew@redhat.com \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®