Re: [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts

[John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>]

On 4/26/22 11:15, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:08 PM John Johansen
> <john.johansen@canonical.com> wrote:
>> On 4/18/22 07:59, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>> Create a new audit record AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS.
>>> An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is:
>>>
>>>     type=MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS[1420]
>>>     msg=audit(1600880931.832:113)
>>>     subj_apparmor=unconfined
>>>     subj_smack=_
>>>
>>> When an audit event includes a AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record
>>> the "subj=" field in other records in the event will be "subj=?".
>>> An AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record is supplied when the system has
>>> multiple security modules that may make access decisions based
>>> on a subject security context.
>>>
>>> Functions are created to manage the skb list in the audit_buffer.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
>>
>> Besides moving the aux fns, and the whining below
>> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> 
> ...
> 
>>> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
>>> index 4d44c05053b0..8ed2d717c217 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/audit.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
>>> @@ -2185,16 +2238,44 @@ int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>>>       if (!lsmblob_is_set(&blob))
>>>               return 0;
>>>
>>> -     error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context, LSMBLOB_FIRST);
>>> +     if (!lsm_multiple_contexts()) {
>>> +             error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context,
>>> +                                              LSMBLOB_FIRST);
>>> +             if (error) {
>>> +                     if (error != -EINVAL)
>>> +                             goto error_path;
>>> +                     return 0;
>>> +             }
>>>
>>> -     if (error) {
>>> -             if (error != -EINVAL)
>>> +             audit_log_format(ab, " subj=%s", context.context);
>>> +             security_release_secctx(&context);
>>> +     } else {
>>> +             /* Multiple LSMs provide contexts. Include an aux record. */
>>> +             audit_log_format(ab, " subj=?");
>>
>> just me whining, you sure we can't just drop subj= here
> 
> Have I recently given you my "the audit code is crap" speech? ;)
> 
hehehe, I get it, something about glass houses and stones. the whole newline
mess in path 28/29 that I would dearly love to drop.

> I more or less answered this with my comments on the earlier patch,
> but we need to keep this around for compatibility.  It will get better
> in the future.
>