From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:08:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad1e85e1-8706-7b93-59cd-99ccef273be4@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
On 4/18/22 07:59, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Create a new audit record AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS.
> An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is:
>
> type=MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS[1420]
> msg=audit(1600880931.832:113)
> subj_apparmor=unconfined
> subj_smack=_
>
> When an audit event includes a AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record
> the "subj=" field in other records in the event will be "subj=?".
> An AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record is supplied when the system has
> multiple security modules that may make access decisions based
> on a subject security context.
>
> Functions are created to manage the skb list in the audit_buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Besides moving the aux fns, and the whining below
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> kernel/audit.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> index 8eda133ca4c1..af0aaccfaf57 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@
> #define AUDIT_MAC_UNLBL_STCDEL 1417 /* NetLabel: del a static label */
> #define AUDIT_MAC_CALIPSO_ADD 1418 /* NetLabel: add CALIPSO DOI entry */
> #define AUDIT_MAC_CALIPSO_DEL 1419 /* NetLabel: del CALIPSO DOI entry */
> +#define AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS 1420 /* Multiple LSM task contexts */
>
> #define AUDIT_FIRST_KERN_ANOM_MSG 1700
> #define AUDIT_LAST_KERN_ANOM_MSG 1799
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 4d44c05053b0..8ed2d717c217 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -2175,8 +2175,61 @@ void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
> audit_log_format(ab, "(null)");
> }
>
> +/**
> + * audit_buffer_aux_new - Add an aux record buffer to the skb list
> + * @ab: audit_buffer
> + * @type: message type
> + *
> + * Aux records are allocated and added to the skb list of
> + * the "main" record. The ab->skb is reset to point to the
> + * aux record on its creation. When the aux record in complete
> + * ab->skb has to be reset to point to the "main" record.
> + * This allows the audit_log_ functions to be ignorant of
> + * which kind of record it is logging to. It also avoids adding
> + * special data for aux records.
> + *
> + * On success ab->skb will point to the new aux record.
> + * Returns 0 on success, -ENOMEM should allocation fail.
> + */
> +static int audit_buffer_aux_new(struct audit_buffer *ab, int type)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(ab->skb != skb_peek(&ab->skb_list));
> +
> + ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, ab->gfp_mask);
> + if (!ab->skb)
> + goto err;
> + if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
> + goto err;
> + skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
> +
> + audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%llu.%03lu:%u): ",
> + (unsigned long long)ab->stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
> + ab->stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
> + ab->stamp.serial);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + kfree_skb(ab->skb);
> + ab->skb = skb_peek(&ab->skb_list);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * audit_buffer_aux_end - Switch back to the "main" record from an aux record
> + * @ab: audit_buffer
> + *
> + * Restores the "main" audit record to ab->skb.
> + */
> +static void audit_buffer_aux_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> +{
> + ab->skb = skb_peek(&ab->skb_list);
> +}
> +
> +
> int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> {
> + int i;
> int error;
> struct lsmblob blob;
> struct lsmcontext context;
> @@ -2185,16 +2238,44 @@ int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> if (!lsmblob_is_set(&blob))
> return 0;
>
> - error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context, LSMBLOB_FIRST);
> + if (!lsm_multiple_contexts()) {
> + error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context,
> + LSMBLOB_FIRST);
> + if (error) {
> + if (error != -EINVAL)
> + goto error_path;
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> - if (error) {
> - if (error != -EINVAL)
> + audit_log_format(ab, " subj=%s", context.context);
> + security_release_secctx(&context);
> + } else {
> + /* Multiple LSMs provide contexts. Include an aux record. */
> + audit_log_format(ab, " subj=?");
just me whining, you sure we can't just drop subj= here
> + error = audit_buffer_aux_new(ab, AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS);
> + if (error)
> goto error_path;
> - return 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++) {
> + if (blob.secid[i] == 0)
> + continue;
> + error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context, i);
> + if (error) {
> + audit_log_format(ab, "%ssubj_%s=?",
> + i ? " " : "",
> + lsm_slot_to_name(i));
> + if (error != -EINVAL)
> + audit_panic("error in audit_log_task_context");
> + } else {
> + audit_log_format(ab, "%ssubj_%s=%s",
> + i ? " " : "",
> + lsm_slot_to_name(i),
> + context.context);
> + security_release_secctx(&context);
> + }
> + }
> + audit_buffer_aux_end(ab);
> }
>
> - audit_log_format(ab, " subj=%s", context.context);
> - security_release_secctx(&context);
> return 0;
>
> error_path:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220418145945.38797-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 00/29] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 01/29] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:51 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 02/29] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 03/29] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-26 23:15 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 04/29] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 06/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:49 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 07/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 08/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 0:38 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 09/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 10/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 11/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 12/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 18:02 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 14/29] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 15/29] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 16/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 17/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 18/29] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 19/29] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 20/29] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 21/29] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 22/29] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 17:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 23/29] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:31 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:03 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:58 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:18 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 15:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 16:02 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 20:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 24/29] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:26 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-25 23:33 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:27 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 1:06 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:12 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:01 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:28 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 1:08 ` John Johansen [this message]
2022-04-26 18:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:07 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 27/29] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:29 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 3:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:24 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 28/29] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 8:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 29/29] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad1e85e1-8706-7b93-59cd-99ccef273be4@canonical.com \
--to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®