From: "Nitin Gupta" <nitingupta910@gmail.com>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
"Daniel Hazelton" <dhazelton@enter.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm-cc@laptop.org,
linuxcompressed-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Richard Purdie" <richard@openedhand.com>,
"Bret Towe" <magnade@gmail.com>,
"Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:01:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cefeab80705292231g4c166cd8xd920f2721cbb9c0e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070529212625.GS3899@stusta.de>
On 5/30/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:10:05PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> > On May 28 2007 19:11, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> You completely miss the point of my question.
>
> It's about the performance improvements of the modified code that were
> mentioned.
>
> What you are talking about shouldn't have any effect on the generated
> code.
>
After Daniel refined this testing program, we can see that perf gain
is < 2% which can surely be accounted to cleanups like unnecessary
castings in tight loops.
Again, all the original code has been retained _as-is_. Whatever was
changed, has been mentioned in that detailed changelog that I post
along with patch.
If someone want to review these 500 lines with this changelog in hand,
it should not take more than couple of hours. If no-one can see any
problem in code by now and considering that it's tested on x86(_32),
amd64, ppc and giving somewhat better perf. than original then I
believe it is unnecessarily hanging outside of -mm tree.
I also contacted author (Markus Oberhumer) regarding above changes but
he seems not be responding right now. But still, if it gets into -mm
and gets used by various related projects then it should be good
enough for mainline also.
Cheers,
Nitin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-30 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-28 14:34 Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 14:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 14:49 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 15:06 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 15:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 16:03 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 17:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 19:59 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 20:18 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 20:52 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 5:55 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 8:08 ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 11:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-29 12:03 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 13:13 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 21:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 21:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-30 5:31 ` Nitin Gupta [this message]
2007-05-30 13:56 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-05-30 14:24 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-28 15:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 15:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 15:55 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 17:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 19:51 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 15:49 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:57 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-29 5:48 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 13:09 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:53 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-28 22:58 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-29 5:58 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 20:14 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 20:33 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 21:48 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 23:32 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30 5:19 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 8:17 ` Makefile question (was [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6) Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 10:41 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 10:51 ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 11:27 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 13:33 ` JFFS2 using 'private' zlib header " Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 13:43 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 15:15 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 16:20 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30 5:31 ` Mark Adler
2007-05-30 13:05 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30 13:30 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 23:02 ` Mark Adler
2007-05-30 23:26 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 3:06 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 17:24 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 13:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-30 15:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-30 16:12 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 16:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-29 20:48 ` [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6 Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-30 5:54 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-30 8:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-30 10:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-31 12:34 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-31 18:21 ` Satyam Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4cefeab80705292231g4c166cd8xd920f2721cbb9c0e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nitingupta910@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dhazelton@enter.net \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm-cc@laptop.org \
--cc=linuxcompressed-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=magnade@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@openedhand.com \
--cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®