mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bret Towe" <magnade@gmail.com>
To: "Nitin Gupta" <nitingupta910@gmail.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm-cc@laptop.org,
	linuxcompressed-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Daniel Hazelton" <dhazelton@enter.net>,
	"Richard Purdie" <richard@openedhand.com>,
	"Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 15:53:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dda83e780705281553s67ace88at60f6ab28b198a832@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cefeab80705280734i37df1742k6738cd4200813684@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/28/07, Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is kernel port of LZO1X-1 compressor and LZO1X decompressor (safe
> version only).
>
> * Changes since 'take 5' (Full Changelog after this):
> - Added compressor and decomrpesssor as separate and hidden config
> options (default: n)
> - Cleanups: removed LZO_CHECK_MPOS_NON_DET macro
> - removed PTR* macros.
>
> * Benchmarks: (system: P4 3GHz, 1G RAM)
> (Using tester program from Daniel)
>
> Following compares this kernel port ('take 6') vs original miniLZO code:
>
> 'TinyLZO' refers to this kernel port.
>
> 10000 run averages:
> 'Tiny LZO':
>        Combined: 61.2223 usec
>        Compression: 41.8412 usec
>        Decompression: 19.3811 usec
> 'miniLZO':
>        Combined: 66.0444 usec
>        Compression: 46.6323 usec
>        Decompression: 19.4121 usec
>
> Result:
> Overall: TinyLZO is 7.3% faster
> Compressor: TinyLZO is 10.2% faster
> Decompressor: TinyLZO is 0.15% faster
>
> TODO: test 'take 6' port on archs other than x86(_32)
>
> * Changelog vs. original LZO:
> 1) Used standard/kernel defined data types: (this eliminated _huge_
> #ifdef chunks)
>   lzo_bytep -> unsigned char *
>   lzo_uint -> size_t
>   lzo_xint -> size_t
>   lzo_uint32p -> u32 *
>   lzo_uintptr_t  -> unsigned long
> 2) Removed everything #ifdef'ed under COPY_DICT (this is not set for
> LZO1X, so removed corres. parts).
> 3) Removed code #ifdef'ed for LZO1Y, LZO1Z, other variants.
> 4) Reformatted the code to match general kernel style.
> 5) The only code change: (as suggested by Andrey)
> -#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
> -                             m_pos = op - 1;
> -                             m_pos -= (*(const unsigned short *)ip) >> 2;
> -#else
> -                             m_pos = op - 1;
> -                             m_pos -= (ip[0] >> 2) + (ip[1] << 6);
> -#endif
>
> + m_pos = op - 1 - (cpu_to_le16(*(const u16 *)ip) >> 2);
>
> (Andrey suggested le16_to_cpu for above but I think it should be cpu_to_le16).
> *** Need testing on big endian machine ***
>
> Similarly:
> -#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
> -                             m_pos -= (*(const unsigned short *)ip) >> 2;
> -#else
> -                             m_pos -= (ip[0] >> 2) + (ip[1] << 6);
> -#endif
>
> + m_pos -= cpu_to_le16(*(const u16 *)ip) >> 2;
>
> 6) Get rid of LZO_CHECK_MPOS_NON_DET macro and PTR* macros.
>
>
> I think it's now ready for mainline inclusion.
>
>
>  include/linux/lzo1x.h        |   66 +++++++++++
>  lib/Kconfig                  |    6 +
>  lib/Makefile                 |    2 +
>  lib/lzo1x/Makefile           |    2 +
>  lib/lzo1x/lzo1x_compress.c   |  259

tested this on ppc and its still good
is there any reason to bother with a test on amd64?
if there is I might be able to get to it tonight

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-28 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-28 14:34 Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 14:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 14:49   ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 15:06     ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 15:43       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 16:03         ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 17:11           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 19:59             ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 20:18             ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 20:52               ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29  5:55             ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29  8:08             ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 11:40               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-29 12:03                 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 13:13                   ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 21:10             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 21:26               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-30  5:31                 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-30 13:56                   ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-05-30 14:24                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-28 15:30   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 15:47     ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 15:55       ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 17:01         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 19:51           ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 15:49     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:57   ` Bret Towe
2007-05-29  5:48     ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 13:09       ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:53 ` Bret Towe [this message]
2007-05-28 22:58   ` Bret Towe
2007-05-29  5:58   ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 20:14     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 20:33       ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 21:48         ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 23:32     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30  5:19       ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29  8:17 ` Makefile question (was [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6) Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 10:41   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 10:51     ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 11:27       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 13:33         ` JFFS2 using 'private' zlib header " Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 13:43           ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 15:15             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 16:20               ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30  5:31               ` Mark Adler
2007-05-30 13:05                 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30 13:30                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 23:02                   ` Mark Adler
2007-05-30 23:26                     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01  3:06                     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 17:24                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 13:41               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-30 15:46                 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-30 16:12                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 16:43                     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-29 20:48 ` [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6 Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-30  5:54   ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-30  8:31     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-30 10:47       ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-31 12:34 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-31 18:21   ` Satyam Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dda83e780705281553s67ace88at60f6ab28b198a832@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=magnade@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhazelton@enter.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-cc@laptop.org \
    --cc=linuxcompressed-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nitingupta910@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@openedhand.com \
    --cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®