* [PATCH 2/5] perf_events: generalize use of event_filter_match() (v6)
@ 2010-11-30 17:20 Stephane Eranian
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2010-11-30 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: peterz, mingo, paulus, davem, fweisbec, perfmon2-devel, eranian,
eranian, robert.richter, acme, lizf
Replace all occurrences of:
event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu == smp_processor_id()
by a call to:
event_filter_match(event)
This makes the code more consistent and will make the cgroup
patch smaller.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 84dc7f6..9ed3723 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static void __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
goto unlock;
/*
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(void *info)
goto unlock;
__perf_event_mark_enabled(event, ctx);
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
goto unlock;
/*
@@ -1330,7 +1330,7 @@ ctx_pinned_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->pinned_groups, group_entry) {
if (event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
continue;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
continue;
if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, 1))
@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ ctx_flexible_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
* Listen to the 'cpu' scheduling filter constraint
* of events:
*/
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
continue;
if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, can_add_hw)) {
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct perf_event_context *ctx, u64 period)
if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
continue;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
continue;
hwc = &event->hw;
@@ -3799,7 +3799,7 @@ static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
return 0;
if (event->attr.comm || event->attr.mmap ||
@@ -3924,7 +3924,7 @@ static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
return 0;
if (event->attr.comm)
@@ -4062,7 +4062,7 @@ static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event,
if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
return 0;
if ((!executable && event->attr.mmap_data) ||
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-11-30 18:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-30 17:20 [PATCH 2/5] perf_events: generalize use of event_filter_match() (v6) Stephane Eranian
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome