* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-22 23:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-23 5:24 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-09-22 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/22/2025 12:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-22 23:00 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-09-23 5:24 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-09-23 7:26 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-09-23 5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On Tue, 23 Sept 2025 at 01:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.12.49-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 1fcc11b6cbfd87e64e99c97c45c4f8fda2192ca5
* git describe: v6.12.48-106-g1fcc11b6cbfd
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.48-106-g1fcc11b6cbfd
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.46-149-g6281f90c1450)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.46-149-g6281f90c1450)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.46-149-g6281f90c1450)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.46-149-g6281f90c1450)
## Test result summary
total: 319891, pass: 296933, fail: 6279, skip: 16277, xfail: 402
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 137 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 56 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 39 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 47 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* modules
* perf
* rcutorture
* rt-tests-cyclicdeadline
* rt-tests-pi-stress
* rt-tests-pmqtest
* rt-tests-rt-migrate-test
* rt-tests-signaltest
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-22 23:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-23 5:24 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-09-23 7:26 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-23 9:47 ` [PATCH 6.12 000/105] " Harshit Mogalapalli
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2025-09-23 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 6.12.49-rc1-g1fcc11b6cbfd #88 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Sep 23 07:12:39 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-23 7:26 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2025-09-23 9:47 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-23 13:01 ` Mark Brown
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2025-09-23 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, Vegard Nossum
Hi Greg,
On 23/09/25 00:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-23 9:47 ` [PATCH 6.12 000/105] " Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2025-09-23 13:01 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-23 13:10 ` Jon Hunter
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-23 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, achill
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 346 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-23 13:01 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-23 13:10 ` Jon Hunter
2025-09-23 13:42 ` Brett Mastbergen
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-09-23 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 21:28:43 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.12:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
120 tests: 120 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.12.49-rc1-g1fcc11b6cbfd
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-23 13:10 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-09-23 13:42 ` Brett Mastbergen
2025-09-23 13:47 ` Peter Schneider
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Brett Mastbergen @ 2025-09-23 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 3:37 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Builds successfully. Boots and works on qemu and Dell XPS 15 9520 w/
Intel Core i7-12600H
Tested-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
Thanks,
Brett
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-23 13:42 ` Brett Mastbergen
@ 2025-09-23 13:47 ` Peter Schneider
2025-09-23 15:04 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-09-23 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
Am 22.09.2025 um 21:28 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-23 13:47 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-09-23 15:04 ` Ron Economos
2025-09-23 20:42 ` Miguel Ojeda
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-09-23 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/22/25 12:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-23 15:04 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-09-23 20:42 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-09-24 0:27 ` Shuah Khan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-09-23 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds,
Miguel Ojeda
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 21:28:43 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested
for loongarch64:
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-23 20:42 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2025-09-24 0:27 ` Shuah Khan
2025-09-24 7:00 ` Hardik Garg
2025-09-26 16:37 ` Guenter Roeck
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-09-24 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, Shuah Khan
On 9/22/25 13:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-24 0:27 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-09-24 7:00 ` Hardik Garg
2025-09-26 16:37 ` Guenter Roeck
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-09-24 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, perf tool, and kselftest builds fine for v6.12.49-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review
2025-09-22 19:28 [PATCH 6.12 000/105] 6.12.49-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-24 7:00 ` Hardik Garg
@ 2025-09-26 16:37 ` Guenter Roeck
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2025-09-26 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/22/25 12:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.49 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:23:52 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 168 pass: 166 fail: 2
Failed builds:
parisc:allmodconfig
s390:allmodconfig
Error log:
In file included from <command-line>:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c: In function 'scale':
include/linux/compiler_types.h:536:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_666' declared with attribute error: clamp() low limit source_min greater than high limit source_max
536 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
The code itself did not change. I strongly suspect that the minmax changes
trigger the problem. Indeed, the build passes after
df39a65668cb (HEAD -> linux-6.12.y) Revert "minmax.h: use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() for the lo < hi test in clamp()"
356a10d8a174 Revert "minmax.h: move all the clamp() definitions after the min/max() ones"
3f151683a9ba Revert "minmax.h: simplify the variants of clamp()"
644728e524c4 Revert "minmax.h: remove some #defines that are only expanded once"
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread