mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<jason@lakedaemon.net>, <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure accessing the correct RD when writing INVALLR
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:27:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d79c6f0-cb38-70fc-93e7-0172417ecbfd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7u6xuur.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 2020/7/17 19:07, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:49:59 +0100,
> Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> The GICv4.1 spec tells us that it's CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE to issue a
>> register-based invalidation operation for a vPEID not mapped to that RD,
>> or another RD within the same CommonLPIAff group.
>>
>> To follow this rule, commit f3a059219bc7 ("irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual
>> exclusion between vPE affinity change and RD access") tried to address the
>> race between the RD accesses and the vPE affinity change, but somehow
>> forgot to take GICR_INVALLR into account. Let's take the vpe_lock before
>> evaluating vpe->col_idx to fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
> 
> Shouldn't this deserve a Fixes: tag?

Yes, I think a

Fixes: f3a059219bc7 ("irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion between 
vPE affinity change and RD access")

should be enough. Should I resend a version with the tag added?


Thanks,
Zenghui

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-20  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-09 13:49 Zenghui Yu
2020-07-17 11:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-20  2:27   ` Zenghui Yu [this message]
2020-07-20  7:41     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d79c6f0-cb38-70fc-93e7-0172417ecbfd@huawei.com \
    --to=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®