mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH 2/2] drbd: remove check of list iterator against head past the loop body
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 00:28:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4dcedb78-355f-ed1a-9af1-27e9e63b5643@linbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220331220349.885126-2-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>

Am 01.04.22 um 00:03 schrieb Jakob Koschel:
> When list_for_each_entry() completes the iteration over the whole list
> without breaking the loop, the iterator value will be a bogus pointer
> computed based on the head element.
> 
> While it is safe to use the pointer to determine if it was computed
> based on the head element, either with list_entry_is_head() or
> &pos->member == head, using the iterator variable after the loop should
> be avoided.
> 
> In preparation to limit the scope of a list iterator to the list
> traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> index c04394518b07..b2571dc77fe6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> @@ -332,17 +332,21 @@ static void set_if_null_req_next(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, struct dr
>   static void advance_conn_req_next(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, struct drbd_request *req)
>   {
>   	struct drbd_connection *connection = peer_device ? peer_device->connection : NULL;
> +	struct drbd_request *iter = req;
>   	if (!connection)
>   		return;
>   	if (connection->req_next != req)
>   		return;
> -	list_for_each_entry_continue(req, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests) {
> -		const unsigned s = req->rq_state;
> -		if (s & RQ_NET_QUEUED)
> +
> +	req = NULL;
> +	list_for_each_entry_continue(iter, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests) {
> +		const unsigned int s = iter->rq_state;
> +
> +		if (s & RQ_NET_QUEUED) {
> +			req = iter;
>   			break;
> +		}
>   	}
> -	if (&req->tl_requests == &connection->transfer_log)
> -		req = NULL;
>   	connection->req_next = req;
>   }
>   
> @@ -358,17 +362,21 @@ static void set_if_null_req_ack_pending(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, st
>   static void advance_conn_req_ack_pending(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, struct drbd_request *req)
>   {
>   	struct drbd_connection *connection = peer_device ? peer_device->connection : NULL;
> +	struct drbd_request *iter = req;
>   	if (!connection)
>   		return;
>   	if (connection->req_ack_pending != req)
>   		return;
> -	list_for_each_entry_continue(req, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests) {
> -		const unsigned s = req->rq_state;
> -		if ((s & RQ_NET_SENT) && (s & RQ_NET_PENDING))
> +
> +	req = NULL;
> +	list_for_each_entry_continue(iter, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests) {
> +		const unsigned int s = iter->rq_state;
> +
> +		if ((s & RQ_NET_SENT) && (s & RQ_NET_PENDING)) {
> +			req = iter;
>   			break;
> +		}
>   	}
> -	if (&req->tl_requests == &connection->transfer_log)
> -		req = NULL;
>   	connection->req_ack_pending = req;
>   }
>   
> @@ -384,17 +392,21 @@ static void set_if_null_req_not_net_done(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, s
>   static void advance_conn_req_not_net_done(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, struct drbd_request *req)
>   {
>   	struct drbd_connection *connection = peer_device ? peer_device->connection : NULL;
> +	struct drbd_request *iter = req;
>   	if (!connection)
>   		return;
>   	if (connection->req_not_net_done != req)
>   		return;
> -	list_for_each_entry_continue(req, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests) {
> -		const unsigned s = req->rq_state;
> -		if ((s & RQ_NET_SENT) && !(s & RQ_NET_DONE))
> +
> +	req = NULL;
> +	list_for_each_entry_continue(iter, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests) {
> +		const unsigned int s = iter->rq_state;
> +
> +		if ((s & RQ_NET_SENT) && !(s & RQ_NET_DONE)) {
> +			req = iter;
>   			break;
> +		}
>   	}
> -	if (&req->tl_requests == &connection->transfer_log)
> -		req = NULL;
>   	connection->req_not_net_done = req;
>   }
>   

Hi Jakob,

Both of these look good to me, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>

Regards, Christoph

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-31 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-31 22:03 [PATCH 1/2] drbd: remove usage of list iterator variable after loop for list_for_each_entry_safe_from() Jakob Koschel
2022-03-31 22:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] drbd: remove check of list iterator against head past the loop body Jakob Koschel
2022-03-31 22:28   ` Christoph Böhmwalder [this message]
2022-03-31 23:09     ` [Drbd-dev] " Jens Axboe
2022-04-01 23:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] drbd: remove usage of list iterator variable after loop for list_for_each_entry_safe_from() Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4dcedb78-355f-ed1a-9af1-27e9e63b5643@linbit.com \
    --to=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
    --cc=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®