From: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ulrich Lukas <stellplatz-nr.13a@datenparkplatz.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it,
ryov@valinux.co.jp, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp,
dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
righi.andrea@gmail.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, agk@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
jmarchan@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Do we support ioprio on SSDs with NCQ (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:09:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e5e476b0910051409x33f8365flf32e8e7548d72e79@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49my457uef.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
> Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Moreover, I suggest removing also the slice_resid part, since its
>> semantics doesn't seem consistent.
>> When computed, it is not the residency, but the remaining time slice.
>
> It stands for residual, not residency. Make more sense?
It makes sense when computed, but not when used in rb_key computation.
Why should we postpone queues that where preempted, instead of giving
them a boost?
Thanks,
Corrado
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-02 10:55 IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-02 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-02 12:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-02 15:27 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-02 15:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-02 15:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-02 15:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-02 16:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-02 16:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-02 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-02 22:14 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-02 22:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-03 12:43 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-03 13:38 ` Do we support ioprio on SSDs with NCQ (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10) Vivek Goyal
2009-10-04 9:15 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-04 12:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-04 12:46 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-04 16:20 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-10-05 21:21 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-05 15:06 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-10-05 21:09 ` Corrado Zoccolo [this message]
2009-10-06 8:41 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 9:00 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-06 18:53 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 21:36 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e5e476b0910051409x33f8365flf32e8e7548d72e79@mail.gmail.com \
--to=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=stellplatz-nr.13a@datenparkplatz.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome