From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, bvanassche@acm.org, andersson@kernel.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com,
konradybcio@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 4/4] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: read max-microamp values from device tree
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 19:45:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4efc8a3a-ceb6-40dc-b877-328b86348e0b@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31461227-3f3a-4316-9c8a-c851209d0278@quicinc.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1202 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 11:26:17PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> 1. Regulator and PMIC configurations are board-specific, meaning they can
> vary significantly across different platforms. For example, some boards may
> use different generations of UFS devices — such as UFS 2.x — which come with
> distinct power and load requirements and some with UFS3.x which has it own
> power/load requirement.
Requirements from generations of UFS devices presumably come from the
UFS spec and should just be known though?
> 2. UFS PHY load and PMIC requirements also varies across targets, depending
> on the underlying technology node and the specific PHY capabilities. These
> differences can be influenced by the MIPI version or other implementation
> details.
If you've got non-enumerable PHYs that have a big impact that's a much
clearer use case for putting things in DT.
> Given this variability, expressing these requirements in the device tree
> allows for a flexible and accurate way to describe board-specific
> constraints without hardcoding them into the driver.
There's still the issue with making this a thing for all regulators, not
just for this specific device.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-07 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 15:43 [PATCH V1 0/4] Add support to configure regulator load for UFS QMP PHY Nitin Rawat
2025-08-06 15:43 ` [PATCH V1 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add max-microamp properties for PHY and PLL supplies Nitin Rawat
2025-08-08 7:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-11 15:20 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-08-06 15:43 ` [PATCH V1 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: add max-microamp for UFS " Nitin Rawat
2025-08-08 7:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-08 8:58 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-08-08 9:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-08 15:19 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-09 11:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-11 19:55 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-12 10:52 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-08-12 11:38 ` 回复: " yizhijiao2025
2025-08-13 20:47 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-11 15:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-08-06 15:43 ` [PATCH V1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Nitin Rawat
2025-08-06 15:43 ` [PATCH V1 4/4] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: read max-microamp values from device tree Nitin Rawat
2025-08-06 15:58 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-08-06 16:51 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-07 13:06 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-08-07 13:44 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-07 15:42 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-07 17:26 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-07 17:35 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-07 17:43 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-07 17:56 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-07 18:45 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2025-08-07 20:45 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-08 7:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-07 17:43 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-08-07 18:09 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-07 19:09 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-11 15:50 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-08-11 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-11 19:48 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-13 21:01 ` Nitin Rawat
2025-08-08 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-09 7:30 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-08-11 19:49 ` Nitin Rawat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4efc8a3a-ceb6-40dc-b877-328b86348e0b@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®