mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	"Dan Carpenter" <error27@gmail.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bios: Move a variable assignment behind a null pointer check in intel_bios_encoder_supports_dp_dual_mode()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:15:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fad393f-ab3f-4f29-b0a3-8ef440b0e82e@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alZVl0o7uBoncUos@intel.com>

>> The address of a data structure member was determined before
>> a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
>> the function “intel_bios_encoder_supports_dp_dual_mode”.
>>
>> Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by reducing the scope for
>> the variable “child” behind condition checks.
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> @@ -3514,8 +3514,6 @@ bool intel_bios_is_port_present(struct intel_display *display, enum port port)
>>  
>>  bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_dp_dual_mode(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
>>  {
>> -	const struct child_device_config *child = &devdata->child;
>> -
>>  	if (!devdata)
>>  		return false;
>>  
>> @@ -3523,6 +3521,8 @@ bool intel_bios_encoder_supports_dp_dual_mode(const struct intel_bios_encoder_da
>>  	    !intel_bios_encoder_supports_hdmi(devdata))
>>  		return false;
>>  
>> +	const struct child_device_config *child = &devdata->child;
>> +
> 
> does it compile?
> 
> please keep the variable definition where it is and move only its
> assignment after the null check.
Would you find the proposed adjustment more acceptable if a bit of source code
would be moved into another function?
https://refactoring.com/catalog/extractFunction.html

Regards,
Markus

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-13 14:05 Markus Elfring
2026-07-14 15:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-07-14 15:46   ` Dan Carpenter
2026-07-14 16:10     ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-28 12:15   ` Markus Elfring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4fad393f-ab3f-4f29-b0a3-8ef440b0e82e@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®