From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 17:52:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4feef462-95db-4c88-8dec-eb9ff89ede1b@rbox.co> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pstj7youxwwrpj3bl2a76kh2t62by2vdakv5elqvueobw3o4pj@tnknzlqdt344>
On 11/24/25 12:49, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 10:46:22PM +0100, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> On 11/21/25 10:21, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 10:12:20PM +0100, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>>>> On 11/19/25 20:52, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> To follow up, should I add a version of syzkaller's lockdep warning repro
>>>>> to vsock test suite? In theory it could test this fix here as well, but in
>>>>> practice the race window is small and hitting it (the brute way) takes
>>>>> prohibitively long.
>>>>
>>>> Replying to self to add more data.
>>>>
>>>> After reverting
>>>>
>>>> f7c877e75352 ("vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport()")
>>>> 002541ef650b ("vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already
>>>> established")
>>>>
>>>> adding
>>>>
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>>>> @@ -2014,6 +2014,7 @@ static void test_stream_transport_change_client(const
>>>> struct test_opts *opts)
>>>> perror("socket");
>>>> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>>>> }
>>>> + enable_so_linger(s, 1);
>>>>
>>>> ret = connect(s, (struct sockaddr *)&sa, sizeof(sa));
>>>> /* The connect can fail due to signals coming from the
>>>>
>>>> is enough for vsock_test to trigger the lockdep warning syzkaller found.
>>>>
>>>
>>> cool, so if it's only that, maybe is worth adding.
>>
>> Ok, there it is:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251123-vsock_test-linger-lockdep-warn-v1-1-4b1edf9d8cdc@rbox.co/
>
> Great!
>
>>
>> And circling back to [1], let me know if you think it's worth adding to the
>> suit. I guess it would test the case #2 from [2], but it'd take another 2s
>
> If you think it is better to put them in vsock tests, instead of bpf,
> it's fine by me. 2s more is okay IMO.
OK, here's a followup:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260123-selftest-signal-on-connect-v1-0-b0256e7025b6@rbox.co/
[...]
>> [1]:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/fjy4jaww6xualdudevfuyoavnrbu45cg4d7erv4rttde363xfc@nahglijbl2eg/
>> [2]:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251119-vsock-interrupted-connect-v2-1-70734cf1233f@rbox.co/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 20:57 Michal Luczaj
2025-11-18 9:51 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-11-18 22:02 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-11-19 10:36 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-11-19 14:09 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-11-19 16:31 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-11-19 19:52 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-11-20 21:12 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-11-21 9:21 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-11-23 21:46 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-11-24 11:49 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-01-23 16:52 ` Michal Luczaj [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4feef462-95db-4c88-8dec-eb9ff89ede1b@rbox.co \
--to=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®