mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
  2001-10-20  7:27 Virtual Wire v.s. APIC Earle Nietzel
@ 2001-10-19 23:23 ` Martin Devera
  2001-10-19 23:45   ` Andrew Morton
  2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2001-10-19 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi,

While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.

At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
of both VMs.

http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm

Enjoy. devik


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
  2001-10-19 23:23 ` DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs Martin Devera
@ 2001-10-19 23:45   ` Andrew Morton
  2001-10-20  3:36     ` Daniel Phillips
                       ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2001-10-19 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Devera; +Cc: linux-kernel

Martin Devera wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
> 
> At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> of both VMs.
> 
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
> 

Oh my that is cute.     Will you be publishing the gcc patch
and perl script sometime?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
  2001-10-19 23:45   ` Andrew Morton
@ 2001-10-20  3:36     ` Daniel Phillips
  2001-10-20  7:34     ` Martin Devera
  2001-10-21 17:46     ` [UPDATE] " Martin Devera
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Phillips @ 2001-10-20  3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Martin Devera; +Cc: linux-kernel

On October 20, 2001 01:45 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Martin Devera wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> > graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
> > 
> > At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> > of both VMs.
> > 
> > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
> > 
> 
> Oh my that is cute.     Will you be publishing the gcc patch
> and perl script sometime?

Oh yes, it's really lovely.  An great starting point for reverse-enginee^W^W 
understanding both VM designs.

--
Daniel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Virtual Wire v.s. APIC
@ 2001-10-20  7:27 Earle Nietzel
  2001-10-19 23:23 ` DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs Martin Devera
  2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Earle Nietzel @ 2001-10-20  7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-smp, linux-kernel

Under the new 2.4.x series kernel, should you use the APIC mode?

Or do you have to continue using the Virtual Wire mode?

Thanks for any answers...





P.S. I am only participating on the linux-smp so any linux-kernel replies 
please forward me a copy, thanx.


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
  2001-10-19 23:45   ` Andrew Morton
  2001-10-20  3:36     ` Daniel Phillips
@ 2001-10-20  7:34     ` Martin Devera
  2001-10-21 17:46     ` [UPDATE] " Martin Devera
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2001-10-20  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel

> > While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> > graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
> > 
> > At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> > of both VMs.
> > 
> > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
> > 
> 
> Oh my that is cute.     Will you be publishing the gcc patch
> and perl script sometime?

Yeah I will probably at Sunday. Now I have to hurry to prepare
our wedding.
devik


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [UPDATE] Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
  2001-10-19 23:45   ` Andrew Morton
  2001-10-20  3:36     ` Daniel Phillips
  2001-10-20  7:34     ` Martin Devera
@ 2001-10-21 17:46     ` Martin Devera
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2001-10-21 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel

> > Hi,
> > 
> > While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> > graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
> > 
> > At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> > of both VMs.
> > 
> > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
> > 
> 
> Oh my that is cute.     Will you be publishing the gcc patch
> and perl script sometime?

There are sources and various notes (printing) on site mentioned above.
There is idea of dynamic generator for all kernels too.

Enjoy. devik


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
  2001-10-20  7:27 Virtual Wire v.s. APIC Earle Nietzel
  2001-10-19 23:23 ` DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs Martin Devera
@ 2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
  2001-10-21 19:34   ` Martin Devera
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sam Vilain @ 2001-10-21 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Devera; +Cc: linux-kernel

These graphs remind me of the GCC node introspector project...

https://sourceforge.net/projects/introspector/

On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 01:23:35 +0200 (CEST)
Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
> 
> At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> of both VMs.
> 
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
> 
> Enjoy. devik
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
  2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
@ 2001-10-21 19:34   ` Martin Devera
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2001-10-21 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sam Vilain; +Cc: linux-kernel

Thanks for the link ! I never liked effort duplication ! :))

On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Sam Vilain wrote:

> These graphs remind me of the GCC node introspector project...
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/introspector/
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-21 19:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-20  7:27 Virtual Wire v.s. APIC Earle Nietzel
2001-10-19 23:23 ` DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs Martin Devera
2001-10-19 23:45   ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-20  3:36     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-20  7:34     ` Martin Devera
2001-10-21 17:46     ` [UPDATE] " Martin Devera
2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
2001-10-21 19:34   ` Martin Devera

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®