* DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
2001-10-20 7:27 Virtual Wire v.s. APIC Earle Nietzel
@ 2001-10-19 23:23 ` Martin Devera
2001-10-19 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2001-10-19 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
of both VMs.
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
Enjoy. devik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
2001-10-19 23:23 ` DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs Martin Devera
@ 2001-10-19 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-20 3:36 ` Daniel Phillips
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2001-10-19 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Devera; +Cc: linux-kernel
Martin Devera wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
>
> At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> of both VMs.
>
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
>
Oh my that is cute. Will you be publishing the gcc patch
and perl script sometime?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
2001-10-19 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2001-10-20 3:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-20 7:34 ` Martin Devera
2001-10-21 17:46 ` [UPDATE] " Martin Devera
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Phillips @ 2001-10-20 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Martin Devera; +Cc: linux-kernel
On October 20, 2001 01:45 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Martin Devera wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> > graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
> >
> > At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> > of both VMs.
> >
> > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
> >
>
> Oh my that is cute. Will you be publishing the gcc patch
> and perl script sometime?
Oh yes, it's really lovely. An great starting point for reverse-enginee^W^W
understanding both VM designs.
--
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Virtual Wire v.s. APIC
@ 2001-10-20 7:27 Earle Nietzel
2001-10-19 23:23 ` DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs Martin Devera
2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Earle Nietzel @ 2001-10-20 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-smp, linux-kernel
Under the new 2.4.x series kernel, should you use the APIC mode?
Or do you have to continue using the Virtual Wire mode?
Thanks for any answers...
P.S. I am only participating on the linux-smp so any linux-kernel replies
please forward me a copy, thanx.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
2001-10-19 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-20 3:36 ` Daniel Phillips
@ 2001-10-20 7:34 ` Martin Devera
2001-10-21 17:46 ` [UPDATE] " Martin Devera
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2001-10-20 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
> > While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> > graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
> >
> > At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> > of both VMs.
> >
> > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
> >
>
> Oh my that is cute. Will you be publishing the gcc patch
> and perl script sometime?
Yeah I will probably at Sunday. Now I have to hurry to prepare
our wedding.
devik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [UPDATE] Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
2001-10-19 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-20 3:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-20 7:34 ` Martin Devera
@ 2001-10-21 17:46 ` Martin Devera
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2001-10-21 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> > graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
> >
> > At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> > of both VMs.
> >
> > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
> >
>
> Oh my that is cute. Will you be publishing the gcc patch
> and perl script sometime?
There are sources and various notes (printing) on site mentioned above.
There is idea of dynamic generator for all kernels too.
Enjoy. devik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
2001-10-20 7:27 Virtual Wire v.s. APIC Earle Nietzel
2001-10-19 23:23 ` DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs Martin Devera
@ 2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
2001-10-21 19:34 ` Martin Devera
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sam Vilain @ 2001-10-21 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Devera; +Cc: linux-kernel
These graphs remind me of the GCC node introspector project...
https://sourceforge.net/projects/introspector/
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 01:23:35 +0200 (CEST)
Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
> graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.
>
> At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
> of both VMs.
>
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm
>
> Enjoy. devik
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs
2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
@ 2001-10-21 19:34 ` Martin Devera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2001-10-21 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Vilain; +Cc: linux-kernel
Thanks for the link ! I never liked effort duplication ! :))
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Sam Vilain wrote:
> These graphs remind me of the GCC node introspector project...
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/introspector/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-21 19:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-20 7:27 Virtual Wire v.s. APIC Earle Nietzel
2001-10-19 23:23 ` DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs Martin Devera
2001-10-19 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-20 3:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-20 7:34 ` Martin Devera
2001-10-21 17:46 ` [UPDATE] " Martin Devera
2001-10-21 19:16 ` Sam Vilain
2001-10-21 19:34 ` Martin Devera
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®