From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
To: Ian Abbott <ian.abbott@mev.co.uk>
Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/90] staging: comedi: amplc_dio200: store the pci_dev in the comedi_device
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:27:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5007E0FE.4030602@mev.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5007DD1F.4040703@mev.co.uk>
On 2012-07-19 11:10, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
>> pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
>>
>> Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
>> also cleanup the detach a bit. Remove the IS_ENABLED() tests in
>> the detach. If the pci_dev is non NULL it's a PCI device otherwise
>> it's an ISA device. Using IS_ENABLED() to omit the code paths
>> makes the code a bit confusing and doesn't save much.
>
> No, you really need to check thisboard->bustype in the detach() because
> hw_dev might be NULL for a PCI board if the attach() failed.
Actually, your patch wouldn't do any harm as dev->iobase would be 0. It
would just go through the "failed ISA device" path instead of the
"failed PCI device" path. It would be more robust to check
thisboard->bustype though.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@mev.co.uk> )=-
-=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-19 1:37 H Hartley Sweeten
2012-07-19 10:10 ` Ian Abbott
2012-07-19 10:27 ` Ian Abbott [this message]
2012-07-19 10:38 ` Ian Abbott
2012-07-19 17:20 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-07-19 17:14 ` H Hartley Sweeten
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5007E0FE.4030602@mev.co.uk \
--to=abbotti@mev.co.uk \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hartleys@visionengravers.com \
--cc=ian.abbott@mev.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome