From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:36:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5008296C.5070709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <500561AF.9090901@gmail.com>
On 17.07.2012 14:59, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> Hi Sven,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:40:07PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>>>> This seems to have been broken since 2010, so obviously noone actually
>>>>>> cares about the driver:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> make[4]: *** [drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.o] Error 1
>>>>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c: In function 'eeti_ts_irq_active':
>>>>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_to_gpio' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> irq_to_gpio isn't available on most platforms today, so the driver
>>>>>> will need some rework by someone who has hardware access and can test
>>>>>> (to make sure that, for example, switching to level interrupts and just
>>>>>> keep taking them while there's more to process works).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess it could just be scheduled for removal, but let's start with
>>>>>> marking it CONFIG_BROKEN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, it probably works quite well on arches that do have irq_to_gpio(),
>>>>> let's ask Daniel and Sven if they still have this hardware and if they
>>>>> can try the patch below that implements what you suggested.
>>>>
>>>> This hardware is still in use and we also still follow kernel
>>>> development and try to update our customer devices to recent kernel
>>>> versions regularly. Currently we are at 3.1.10 and the touchscreen
>>>> works well with that. I'll try to update to a more recent kernel
>>>> next week and will try your patch.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you have a chance to test the patch?
>>
>> *ping*
>>
>> It would be nice to get driver in mainline compile [and work] again...
>
> We gave that patch a quick try today and it doesn't seem to work. We
> don't get any events from the touch screen anymore. We need to debug
> this further, hopefully by the end of this week.
>
> If there's anything obvious in the setup of the threaded IRQ handler,
> please let us know. Otherwise, I'll get back once I have a fixed version
> of the patch.
Ok, finally I found some time. In general, the patch works fine. The
only detail I had to amend was the irqflags, which were changed from
IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING/IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING to
IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH/IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW, which doesn't work as the PXA can't
deal with level-based IRQs. Changing this back to RISING/FALLING makes
the driver work again.
With that correction, feel free to add my Acked-by:/Tested-by:
Thanks and sorry again for the slow response.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-07 5:40 Olof Johansson
2012-04-07 7:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-04-07 18:38 ` Sven Neumann
2012-04-07 20:32 ` Olof Johansson
2012-04-07 21:04 ` Joachim Eastwood
2012-04-09 2:28 ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-04-10 10:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-10 16:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-05-03 4:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-07-13 7:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-07-15 18:21 ` Daniel Mack
2012-07-17 12:59 ` Daniel Mack
2012-07-19 15:36 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2012-07-23 16:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-07-23 17:58 ` Daniel Mack
2012-07-24 18:01 ` Emulating level IRQs (was: Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN) Daniel Mack
2012-07-24 18:58 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-05 16:22 ` Emulating level IRQs Daniel Mack
2012-08-05 16:56 ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-08-05 17:56 ` Daniel Mack
2012-08-06 1:45 ` Eric Miao
2012-08-06 16:36 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-07 15:19 ` Daniel Mack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5008296C.5070709@gmail.com \
--to=zonque@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=s.neumann@raumfeld.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome